STUDIO PEREGO S... Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do
The STUDIO PEREGO S... Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware Group (reported March 21, 2022) is an unverified claim; the data involved is undisclosed belonging to roughly unknown people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.
What happened
STUDIO PEREGO S... appeared on the lockbit2 ransomware leak site on 21 March 2022. The listing stated that internal files had been exfiltrated during a ransomware attack. No further technical details, such as the initial access method or the volume of data involved, were included in the public listing. The organisation has not confirmed or denied the incident in any public record.
Who is lockbit2?
Lockbit2 is the name used by a ransomware operation that first appeared in 2019 and later rebranded as LockBit 2.0. The group is known for encrypting victim systems and then threatening to publish stolen data if a ransom is not paid. It maintains a public leak site where it lists organisations it claims to have compromised. The group has been linked to hundreds of incidents worldwide, though law-enforcement agencies have disrupted some of its infrastructure in subsequent years.
About STUDIO PEREGO S...
STUDIO PEREGO S... operates as an architectural and design practice. Firms of this type routinely manage project documentation, client correspondence, technical drawings and administrative records. Because such material often contains personal identifiers, contract details and proprietary design information, the sector holds data that can be sensitive to both individuals and commercial clients.
What was likely exposed
The only detail released by the listing is that internal files were taken. The precise categories of data contained in those files have not been disclosed. Organisations in the architectural sector commonly store client names, addresses, project specifications, financial records and employee information; however, whether any of these categories were present in the exfiltrated material remains unconfirmed.
Why it matters
When internal files from a design practice are published without consent, the main consequences are loss of confidentiality for clients and potential exposure of personal or commercial information. Individuals named in project documents may face risks of identity misuse or unwanted contact. The organisation itself may incur costs related to investigation, notification and remediation, even if the full scope of the data remains unclear.
If your data was in this claimed breach
Monitor bank and credit accounts for unusual activity and consider placing a credit freeze if personal identifiers were involved. Change passwords for any accounts linked to the organisation and enable multi-factor authentication where available. Readers can run a free exposure scan of their email address against known breach data to check whether their information appears in public listings from this or other incidents.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
bestatt Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware Groupbestattung- Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware Groupkaisoten.co.jp Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware Groupbestattung-walz... Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware GroupLatest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the STUDIO PEREGO S... Listed by lockbit2 Ransomware Group →
Publicly posted by lockbit — unverified claim, pending independent verification
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.