LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › revitalash.com Listed by cactus Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

revitalash.com Listed by cactus Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·January 15, 2025
revitalash.com Listed by cactus Ransomware Group

Reported January 15, 2025.

HIGH
Severity
January 15, 2025
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

revitalash.com has been listed by the cactus ransomware group, with internal files reportedly exfiltrated; the incident was disclosed on January 15, 2025, and the actual date of the breach has not been established. If you have an account or have used revitalash.com services, review your account activity and consider changing passwords or enabling additional security measures.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Contact / identity PII exposed.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

On January 15, 2025, revitalash.com was listed by the cactus ransomware group as a victim of a ransomware attack involving the exfiltration of internal files. Public details remain limited: the number of people affected is unknown, and no further confirmation of the incident beyond the group's claim has been provided in available records. The listing matters because it signals potential exposure of company materials from a cosmetics firm that serves customers, employees, and partners, raising questions about what information may have left the organisation's control.

Athena Cosmetics, Inc., which operates revitalash.com, has not publicly detailed the event in the source material, so the claim rests on the threat actor's leak-site posting. This leaves affected parties and observers with incomplete information while the listing itself draws attention to the risk of ransomware operations that combine encryption with data theft.

Breaking down the breach

According to the available record, revitalash.com was listed by the cactus ransomware group on January 15, 2025. The reported summary identifies the incident as a ransomware attack in which internal files were allegedly exfiltrated. No specific count of affected individuals is given; the figure is listed as unknown. Timing of the intrusion itself, the precise method of initial access, the volume of data taken, and any ransom demand or payment status are not disclosed in the facts. The organisation is described in the listing material as a cosmetics company under Athena Cosmetics, Inc., with a stated revenue of $21.5 million and a business address at 23000 Avalon Blvd, Carson, California, 90745, United States. Beyond the claim of internal-file exfiltration, no additional technical indicators or confirmed data samples appear in the provided record.

Because the listing originates from the threat actor, it must be treated as an unverified claim unless independently confirmed. Public detail on the scale and full scope of the event is therefore limited, and no official statement from the company is included in the source facts.

Inside cactus

Cactus is a ransomware group that has operated in the public domain by targeting organisations, encrypting systems, and exfiltrating data for double-extortion pressure. The group typically posts victim names on dedicated leak sites and threatens to release stolen material if demands are unmet. Its operations have been documented across multiple sectors, with a pattern of claiming responsibility through such listings rather than through verified third-party disclosures. In this case the group claims revitalash.com as a victim and asserts that internal files were taken; no further statements attributed specifically to this incident appear in the facts. Established public reporting on cactus notes its use of common ransomware tactics—initial access followed by lateral movement, data theft, and encryption—but those general patterns do not confirm any particular technique used against revitalash.com.

Attribution rests solely on the leak-site listing. Readers should regard the claim as the group's assertion pending independent verification.

Who is revitalash.com?

Revitalash.com is the online presence of Athena Cosmetics, Inc., a United States-based cosmetics company focused on the manufacture and sale of beauty products. The organisation's own description emphasises safe, reliable, quality products, integrity, and philanthropy, and it serves customers, employees, and partners. Public business information places its address in Carson, California, and lists a phone number of (805) 662-2020, with reported revenue of $21.5 million. Companies in the cosmetics sector commonly maintain customer order and account records, employee information, supplier and partner data, product formulations, marketing materials, and internal operational files. A breach claim against such an organisation is consequential because it can affect both commercial confidentiality and the personal information of individuals who interact with the brand.

The company presents itself as committed to quality and integrity; any confirmed compromise of internal systems would therefore carry reputational and operational weight beyond the immediate technical incident.

What data was at risk

The facts state that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No more granular inventory—such as customer lists, payment details, employee records, or intellectual property—is named. Because the exact contents remain unconfirmed, it is not possible to assert specific data types as fact. Organisations of this kind typically hold customer contact and purchase information, employee personnel files, financial and supplier records, and proprietary product-related documents. Whether any of those categories were among the internal files claimed by cactus is unknown. Public detail on the exposed material is therefore limited to the broad description of internal-file exfiltration.

The real-world impact

For individuals whose information may have been among the internal files, risks include potential misuse of personal or contact details if those records were present, as well as phishing or social-engineering attempts that leverage knowledge of a relationship with the company. Without confirmed data types or an affected-person count, the precise exposure cannot be quantified. For the organisation, a ransomware incident that includes exfiltration can disrupt operations, require forensic investigation and remediation, and create pressure from the threat of public release of stolen material. Reputational effects may follow if customers or partners lose confidence, and regulatory or contractual obligations could arise depending on the nature of any personal data involved. These consequences remain potential rather than proven, given the limited public record.

The absence of confirmed scale means both the company and any potentially affected people must operate with incomplete information while monitoring for further developments.

Were you affected?

If you have been a customer, employee, or partner of revitalash.com or Athena Cosmetics, Inc., treat the listing as a reason for caution rather than confirmed personal exposure. Practical first steps include monitoring financial and email accounts for unusual activity, enabling multi-factor authentication where available, and being alert to unsolicited messages that reference the company or request sensitive information. Because the number of people affected and the precise data types remain unknown, there is no definitive public list of victims. Readers can run a free exposure scan of their email address to check whether their information has already surfaced in known breach data sets. Stay informed through official company notices if any are issued, and avoid sharing additional personal details in response to unverified contact claiming to relate to this incident.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companyrevitalash.com security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See revitalash.com’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

johnpaulrichard.com Listed by cactus Ransomware GroupJanuary 16, 2025jayaapparelgroup.com Listed by cactus Ransomware GroupJanuary 16, 2025uniekinc.com Listed by cactus Ransomware GroupFebruary 5, 2025mgainnovation.com Listed by cactus Ransomware GroupJanuary 23, 2025

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the revitalash.com Listed by cactus Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by cactus — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram