LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › RankWatch Data Breach (2016)

CRITICAL severityConfirmedHow we verify

RankWatch Data Breach (2016): What Was Exposed & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·November 19, 2016

SourceBreach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

RankWatch Data Breach (2016)

Reported November 19, 2016. Approximately 7.4M people affected.

CRITICAL
Severity
7.4M
People affected
5
Data types exposed
November 19, 2016
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The RankWatch Data Breach (2016) (reported November 19, 2016) exposed Email addresses, Employers, Job titles and Names belonging to roughly 7.4M people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
CRITICAL severityConfirmed
Account credentials exposed.
Corroborated by an official disclosure or a verified breach feed.
Was your email in the RankWatch Data Breach (2016) breach?
7.4M accounts were exposed here. See if yours is one — and every other breach it’s in. 15-sec check, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

RankWatch, an SEO management company, was reported to have exposed a database containing records on 7.4 million individuals in approximately November 2016. The incident came to light on November 19, 2016, after the data appeared on an online forum. Public records indicate the exposed information included email addresses, names, employers, job titles and phone numbers.

Inside the incident

The exposure involved a MongoDB instance left accessible without a password. Data from a table labelled "us_emails" was copied and posted publicly. The records contained 7.4 million unique email addresses together with associated names, employers, phone numbers and job titles. When contacted about the incident, RankWatch declined to state the original purpose of the collection, its source or whether the individuals had consented to the storage of their details.

How a breach like this happens

Incidents involving publicly reachable databases often stem from configuration settings that omit authentication requirements. Once an instance is reachable over the internet without credentials, any party that locates it can copy its contents. In this case the data was subsequently shared on a forum, which is a common distribution path for material obtained from misconfigured systems.

About RankWatch

RankWatch provides search-engine optimisation tools and services to clients who track website rankings and related metrics. Organisations in this sector routinely collect contact and professional information to support marketing, lead generation and service delivery. A dataset of this size therefore reflects the scale of records that can accumulate in customer or prospect databases within the industry.

What data was at risk

The exposed records included email addresses, names, employers, job titles and phone numbers. No other data types have been confirmed in public reports. RankWatch did not disclose the original purpose of the collection or confirm whether the individuals had consented to the retention of their information, so the full context of the dataset remains unverified.

Why it matters

Exposure of professional contact details can lead to increased unsolicited messages and targeted phishing attempts that leverage known employer and job-title information. For the organisation, the incident highlights the consequences of leaving production data stores reachable without access controls. Individuals whose records were included have no confirmed indication from the company about how their details were obtained or how long they had been stored.

Were you affected?

Individuals can check whether their email address appears in known breach datasets by using a free exposure scanner that queries public breach repositories. If matches are found, standard steps include monitoring for unusual account activity, using unique passwords for each service and enabling multi-factor authentication where available. No direct notification process from RankWatch has been documented.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Method

CompanyRankWatch security record
74/100
DoxxScan™ · Moderate doxx risk
C- 64Below-average record

1 reported incident on record.

See RankWatch’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Data Enrichment Records Data Breach (2016)December 23, 2016Modern Business Solutions Data Breach (2016)October 8, 2016Justdate.com Data Breach (2016)September 29, 2016Real Estate Mogul Data Breach (2016)September 6, 2016

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the RankWatch Data Breach (2016) →

Verified breach. Breach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram