Rama Judicial Listed by killsec Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

On November 27, 2025, the ransomware group killsec listed Rama Judicial on its leak site. The entry states that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No figure for the number of people affected has been released, and the listing provides no further detail on the volume or nature of the material. The incident adds to the pattern of ransomware operations that target public institutions holding records on individuals and legal processes. Public reporting on the event remains limited to the group’s claim.

Inside the incident

The only confirmed information is the date the listing appeared and the statement that internal files were taken. The number of records, the date of the intrusion, and any ransom demand or payment status are not disclosed in available reporting. Disclosures are recorded as 0/1, indicating no additional public releases tied to the listing at the time of the report.

Inside killsec

Killsec is a ransomware group that maintains a leak site to publish data from victims that do not meet its payment demands. The group’s listings typically include a brief description of the target and a sample of files to demonstrate possession of the material. Public records show the group has previously claimed activity against organizations in multiple sectors, using the same site-based pressure tactic.

Who is Rama Judicial?

Rama Judicial refers to the judicial branch of government in Colombia, responsible for administering courts, managing case files, and processing legal proceedings. Entities of this type routinely collect and store personal identifiers, court documents, contact information, and records related to civil, criminal, and administrative matters. A compromise at such an organization can affect individuals whose cases are or were before the courts, as well as court staff and external parties named in filings.

The information in question

The listing refers only to “internal files exfiltrated in ransomware attack.” No inventory of specific data categories has been published. Organizations in the judicial sector commonly hold names, national identification numbers, addresses, case histories, financial details connected to proceedings, and communications between parties. The exact contents of the exfiltrated material remain unconfirmed.

What's at stake

Individuals named in judicial records face the possibility that personal details could be used for identity-related fraud or targeted scams. Court operations may experience delays if systems were encrypted or if staff must divert resources to containment. The organization itself may incur costs for investigation, system restoration, and any required notifications, though none of these outcomes have been publicly quantified.

What to do if you're exposed

Anyone concerned about possible exposure should monitor financial accounts and credit reports for unusual activity. Changing passwords for any accounts linked to court proceedings and enabling multi-factor authentication where available are standard first steps. Readers can run a free exposure scan of their email address against known breach data to check for appearances in previously published datasets.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.