LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › Pokémon Negro Data Breach (2016)

CRITICAL severityConfirmedHow we verify

Pokémon Negro Data Breach (2016): What Was Exposed & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·October 1, 2016

SourceBreach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Pokémon Negro Data Breach (2016)

Reported October 1, 2016. Approximately 830K people affected.

CRITICAL
Severity
830K
People affected
3
Data types exposed
October 1, 2016
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The Pokémon Negro Data Breach (2016) (reported October 1, 2016) exposed Email addresses, IP addresses and Passwords belonging to roughly 830K people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
CRITICAL severityConfirmed
Plaintext passwords exposed.
Corroborated by an official disclosure or a verified breach feed.
Was your email in the Pokémon Negro Data Breach (2016) breach?
830K accounts were exposed here. See if yours is one — and every other breach it’s in. 15-sec check, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

In October 2016, reports indicated that the Spanish Pokémon site Pokémon Negro had suffered a data breach affecting 830,000 accounts. The disclosed information included email addresses, IP addresses, and passwords stored in plain text. The organisation did not respond to inquiries about the incident. This event matters because the exposed credentials and contact details can be reused across other services, increasing the chance of account takeovers for affected individuals. IP addresses also reveal location details at the time of the breach, which may combine with other available information to narrow down user identities.

Inside the incident

The breach was reported on October 1, 2016. Public records state that 830,000 accounts were involved and that the data included email addresses, IP addresses, and passwords in plain text. No further details on the timing of the intrusion, the method used, or the exact volume of records accessed have been confirmed. Pokémon Negro did not issue a statement or respond when contacted regarding the event.

How a breach like this happens

Incidents involving online account databases often begin with unauthorised access to a web server or application backend. Attackers may exploit unpatched software, weak authentication controls, or stolen administrative credentials to reach stored user records. When passwords are kept in plain text rather than hashed, the entire set of credentials becomes immediately usable once the files are copied. IP addresses are routinely logged by web servers for operational reasons, so they frequently appear alongside account data in such exposures.

About Pokémon Negro

Pokémon Negro operated as a Spanish-language site focused on the Pokémon franchise. Sites of this type typically maintain user accounts to support forums, downloads, or community features. These accounts collect email addresses for registration and IP addresses for logging activity, creating a modest but persistent store of personal identifiers. A breach at such a service is consequential because the affected users are often younger fans or casual participants who may reuse passwords across multiple platforms.

What data was at risk

The reported exposure included email addresses, IP addresses, and passwords stored in plain text. No additional categories of information, such as names, payment details, or private messages, have been confirmed as part of this incident. Organisations in this sector commonly hold only the minimal data needed for account creation and basic logging, yet the exact contents of the extracted files remain unconfirmed beyond the three fields noted above.

What's at stake

Individuals whose email addresses and plain-text passwords were disclosed face the practical risk that those credentials could be tested against other online services. IP addresses tied to specific dates can assist in correlating activity across different platforms. For the organisation, the incident highlights the long-term consequences of storing passwords without hashing, including loss of user trust and potential regulatory scrutiny under data-protection rules applicable in Spain at the time.

What to do if you're exposed

Change the password on the affected account and on any other service where the same password was used. Enable two-factor authentication wherever available and monitor email accounts for unexpected login attempts. Readers can run a free exposure scan of their email address to check whether their information has surfaced in known breach data.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Method

CompanyPokémon Negro security record
73/100
DoxxScan™ · Moderate doxx risk
C- 64Below-average record

1 reported incident on record.

See Pokémon Negro’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Ethereum Data Breach (2016)December 16, 2016Anti Public Combo List Data Breach (2016)December 16, 2016PayAsUGym Data Breach (2016)December 15, 2016MrExcel Data Breach (2016)December 5, 2016

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Pokémon Negro Data Breach (2016) →

Verified breach. Breach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram