LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › Maas911.com Listed by cloak Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

Maas911.com Listed by cloak Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·January 6, 2024
Maas911.com Listed by cloak Ransomware Group

Reported January 6, 2024.

HIGH
Severity
January 6, 2024
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The Maas911.com Listed by cloak Ransomware Group (reported January 6, 2024) is an unverified claim; the data involved is undisclosed belonging to roughly unknown people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

People whose personal or professional details sit inside the systems of an emergency-services technology firm now face the practical question of whether those details have left the organisation’s control. On 6 January 2024 the ransomware group known as cloak publicly listed Maas911.com, a United States-based company, claiming it had exfiltrated internal files. The number of individuals affected remains unknown, and the precise contents of the taken data have not been independently confirmed. For anyone who has ever interacted with the company—employees, contractors, partner agencies or members of the public whose information may have been stored—the listing raises immediate concerns about identity misuse, targeted phishing and the possible exposure of operational records that support emergency response.

Because the claim originates solely from the threat actor’s leak site, the full scope of the incident is still unverified. What is known is limited to the group’s assertion that a ransomware attack occurred and that internal files were removed. That limited public record is enough, however, to warrant careful attention from anyone who may be connected to Maas911.com.

Inside the incident

According to the listing published by cloak, Maas911.com suffered a ransomware attack in which internal files were exfiltrated. The report is dated 6 January 2024 and identifies the organisation as based in the United States. No further technical details—such as the initial access vector, the encryption status of systems, the volume of data taken, or any ransom demand—have been disclosed in the available record. The number of people whose information may be involved is listed as unknown. Public sources do not confirm whether the organisation has acknowledged the claim, restored systems, or notified regulators or affected parties. In short, the incident is known only through the threat actor’s assertion that a ransomware operation targeting Maas911.com resulted in the theft of internal files.

The group behind it: cloak

Cloak is a ransomware operation that follows the now-familiar double-extortion model: encrypting a victim’s systems while simultaneously copying data and threatening to publish it if a ransom is not paid. Like other groups of its type, cloak maintains a leak site on which it posts the names of organisations it claims to have compromised, often accompanied by sample files or countdown timers. The group’s public activity has included listings of companies across multiple sectors; its tactics typically involve phishing, exploitation of remote-access tools, or the abuse of unpatched vulnerabilities to gain an initial foothold. Once inside a network, operators move laterally, identify high-value data, and stage it for exfiltration before deploying encryption. The listing of Maas911.com is therefore best understood as a claim made by the group rather than an independently verified fact. No statements attributed to cloak beyond the simple listing of the victim and the assertion that internal files were taken appear in the public record of this incident.

Maas911.com and its sector

Maas911.com operates in the United States and, by its name and domain, is associated with technology or services supporting 911 emergency communications and public-safety systems. Organisations of this kind commonly develop or maintain software, hardware or data platforms used by emergency call centres, first responders and municipal agencies. Such platforms routinely process call records, location data, personnel information, system configurations and operational logs. Because these systems sit at the intersection of public safety and sensitive personal data, a breach can affect both the confidentiality of citizen information and the integrity of emergency-response infrastructure. Even when the exact business model of a particular firm is not fully detailed in open sources, the sector as a whole is recognised as high-value for attackers precisely because of the sensitivity and operational importance of the data it handles.

What was likely exposed

The only data type named in connection with the incident is “internal files exfiltrated in a ransomware attack.” No inventory of those files—whether they contain employee records, customer or partner data, system credentials, call-centre logs, or proprietary source code—has been released. Organisations that support 911 and emergency-services technology typically hold a mixture of personally identifiable information, operational documentation, network diagrams and authentication materials. It is therefore reasonable to expect that any internal files taken could include some combination of those categories, yet the exact contents remain unconfirmed. Until the organisation or independent investigators publish a verified list, any assertion about specific data elements would be speculative.

What's at stake

For individuals whose information may have been among the internal files, the concrete risks include identity theft, fraudulent account openings, and highly targeted phishing that references genuine organisational details. Employees or contractors could face credential stuffing or social-engineering attempts that exploit knowledge of internal systems. Partner agencies that share data with Maas911.com may need to reassess access controls and monitor for anomalous activity. For the organisation itself, the stakes include potential regulatory scrutiny under U.S. state breach-notification laws, contractual obligations to public-safety clients, and the operational cost of investigating, containing and recovering from a ransomware event. Even if systems were restored quickly, the mere claim of data exfiltration can erode trust among agencies that rely on the company’s products for emergency communications. None of these consequences has been confirmed as having materialised; they represent the ordinary range of outcomes that follow a ransomware claim of this type.

What to do if you're exposed

Anyone who has an email address, account or other relationship with Maas911.com should treat the listing as a prompt for basic hygiene rather than proof of personal compromise. Change passwords on any accounts that may have been reused or shared with the organisation, enable multi-factor authentication wherever it is offered, and watch for unexpected login attempts or phishing messages that reference emergency-services or 911-related topics. Review credit reports and financial statements for unfamiliar activity. If you believe sensitive personal data may have been involved, consider placing a fraud alert with the major credit bureaus. Finally, you can run a free exposure scan of your email address against known breach data sets to determine whether that address has already appeared in publicly circulating dumps; such a scan provides an early indicator but does not replace official notification from the organisation itself.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

CompanyMaas911.com security record
88/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 83Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See Maas911.com’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Ka******.com Listed by cloak Ransomware GroupJuly 22, 2024upcli.com Listed by cloak Ransomware GroupJuly 15, 2024For**********.com Listed by cloak Ransomware GroupJanuary 24, 2024suffolkva.us Listed by cloak Ransomware GroupFebruary 24, 2026

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Maas911.com Listed by cloak Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by cloak — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram