LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › ips-securex.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

ips-securex.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·December 31, 2023
ips-securex.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group

Reported December 31, 2023.

HIGH
Severity
December 31, 2023
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The ips-securex.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group (reported December 31, 2023) is an unverified claim; the data involved is undisclosed belonging to roughly unknown people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Ransomware groups continue to target firms that design and install security systems, treating their internal files as both leverage and a potential source of secondary risk for clients. Against that backdrop, the listing of ips-securex.com by the LockBit3 group on 31 December 2023 is a reminder that even specialised security providers can appear on leak sites when attackers claim to have stolen data.

Public reporting states that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack; the number of people affected remains unknown and further technical detail has not been released. The listing itself is a claim by the group, not an independently verified confirmation of every assertion made on its site.

What happened

On 31 December 2023, the ransomware group LockBit3 listed ips-securex.com among its claimed victims. According to the available summary, the incident involved the exfiltration of internal files during a ransomware attack. No public figure has been given for the volume of data taken, the number of systems affected, or the precise method of initial access. The count of people whose information may have been involved is listed as unknown. Beyond the group’s leak-site claim and the characterisation of the material as internal files, further operational detail remains undisclosed.

The group behind it: lockbit3

LockBit3 is a well-documented ransomware operation that has operated under a ransomware-as-a-service model, recruiting affiliates to deploy its encryptors and manage negotiations. The group is known for double-extortion tactics: encrypting systems while also copying data and threatening to publish it on a dedicated leak site if payment is not made. Public reporting over several years has associated LockBit variants with attacks across manufacturing, professional services, government contractors and technology firms. Listings on its site are claims made by the operators; they do not automatically constitute independent proof of every detail asserted about a particular victim. In this case the facts record only that ips-securex.com was listed and that internal files were described as having been exfiltrated.

Who is ips-securex.com?

IPS Securex, operating under the domain ips-securex.com, is described in public material as a company formed in 1991 with offices and partners throughout the Asia-Pacific region. It has implemented complex integrated security systems and built a reputation for delivering customised solutions. Organisations of this type typically design, supply and maintain physical and electronic security infrastructure—access control, surveillance, intrusion detection and related integration work—for commercial and institutional clients. Because such firms hold project documentation, client configurations, network diagrams and contractual records, a breach can have consequences that extend beyond the company itself to the organisations whose systems it supports.

The information in question

The facts name the exposed material only as “internal files exfiltrated in ransomware attack.” No further breakdown—such as whether the files included employee records, client contracts, technical drawings, credentials or financial data—has been publicly confirmed. Companies that deliver integrated security systems commonly retain design documents, site surveys, equipment inventories, maintenance logs and correspondence that may contain personal or commercially sensitive information. Those categories are typical of the sector; they are not confirmed contents of this particular incident. The exact nature and sensitivity of the files remain unconfirmed pending any fuller disclosure.

Why it matters

For individuals whose details may appear in project files or internal correspondence, the practical risks include targeted phishing, social-engineering attempts that reference real projects, and the longer-term possibility of identity misuse if personal data was present. For the organisation, exposure of internal files can reveal operational methods, client relationships and technical configurations that competitors or other threat actors might exploit. Because the people-affected figure is unknown and the precise data types are not itemised, the scale of individual impact cannot be quantified from public sources. The incident nevertheless illustrates how ransomware claims against security-system providers can create secondary exposure for the clients those providers serve.

What to do if you're exposed

If you have a past or present relationship with IPS Securex—as an employee, contractor or client—treat the listing as a prompt for basic hygiene rather than confirmed personal compromise. Concrete first steps include:

Public detail on this specific event remains limited; further confirmation would need to come from the organisation or independent forensic reporting. Until then, measured personal vigilance is the proportionate response.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companyips-securex.com security record
88/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 83Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See ips-securex.com’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

at-global.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware GroupJune 22, 2024marvell.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware GroupJune 22, 2024kns.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware GroupMay 12, 2024dsglobaltech.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware GroupMarch 26, 2024

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the ips-securex.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by lockbit — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram