LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › inmarsat.com Listed by babuk2 Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

inmarsat.com Listed by babuk2 Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·March 22, 2025
inmarsat.com Listed by babuk2 Ransomware Group

Reported March 22, 2025.

HIGH
Severity
March 22, 2025
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

inmarsat.com was listed by the Babuk2 ransomware group on March 22, 2025, after internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack affecting an undisclosed number of people. Anyone with an account or prior dealings with inmarsat.com should check for unusual activity and consider changing passwords or enabling additional security measures.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

On March 22, 2025, the ransomware group known as babuk2 listed inmarsat.com on its leak site, claiming to have conducted a ransomware attack that involved the exfiltration of internal files. Public details remain limited: the number of people affected is unknown, and no further confirmation of the incident's scope or method has been disclosed beyond the group's listing. This matters because Inmarsat operates in satellite communications, a sector where internal systems often support critical connectivity for maritime, aviation, and government users, raising the potential for operational and privacy consequences if the claim holds.

The listing itself constitutes an unverified claim by the group rather than an independently confirmed breach. Exact timing of any intrusion, the volume of data taken, and whether ransom negotiations occurred are all undisclosed.

Inside the incident

According to the available record, babuk2 reported the listing of inmarsat.com on March 22, 2025. The group asserts that internal files were exfiltrated as part of a ransomware attack. No additional specifics appear in the public facts: the number of individuals potentially affected is listed as unknown, the precise date of any intrusion is not given, and the technical method of access remains undisclosed. There is no independent verification cited that the data has been released or that the organisation has acknowledged the claim. In short, the incident is known only through the group's leak-site entry and the accompanying description of internal-file exfiltration.

Ransomware incidents of this type typically involve encryption of systems combined with data theft for leverage, yet none of those operational details have been confirmed here. Public reporting stops at the listing and the stated data type.

Inside babuk2

Babuk2 is a ransomware operation that has appeared in public threat-intelligence reporting as a successor or rebranded activity linked to the earlier Babuk group. The original Babuk ransomware was active around 2021, known for targeting enterprises and employing double-extortion tactics: encrypting victim systems while simultaneously exfiltrating data and threatening public release if payment was not made. After the original group's source code was allegedly leaked, variants and related actors continued similar patterns under new names. Babuk2 has been observed listing organisations on dedicated leak sites, claiming possession of stolen files and setting deadlines for ransom payment before publication.

Typical tactics associated with this family of actors include initial access via compromised credentials or vulnerabilities, lateral movement inside networks, and selective theft of documents that can pressure victims. The group does not usually publish detailed technical indicators for every listing; instead it posts the victim name and a sample claim of data volume or type. In this case, the only claim tied to inmarsat.com is the exfiltration of internal files. No further statements attributed specifically to this victim appear in the provided facts, so any broader assertions about motives or exact demands remain outside the record.

Who is inmarsat.com?

Inmarsat is a long-established satellite-communications provider whose services support maritime shipping, commercial aviation, government and defence users, and remote industrial operations. The organisation supplies global mobile satellite connectivity, including voice, data and broadband links that keep vessels, aircraft and field teams connected where terrestrial networks are unavailable. In recent years Inmarsat has operated as part of a larger satellite group, yet the brand and its infrastructure continue to handle sensitive operational traffic and customer information.

Organisations in this sector routinely maintain internal files covering network configurations, customer contracts, employee records, billing data, and technical documentation for satellite gateways and terminals. A breach claim against such a provider is consequential because disruption or exposure can affect not only the company itself but also the reliability of communications relied upon by ships at sea, aircraft in flight, and government missions. Even limited internal-file theft can reveal operational details that adversaries might later exploit.

What was likely exposed

The facts state only that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No further breakdown of file types, quantities, or specific categories is provided, and the number of people affected remains unknown. Exact contents are therefore unconfirmed.

Organisations of Inmarsat's type typically hold a range of internal material: employee directories and contact lists, customer account records, technical diagrams of satellite networks, contractual documents, and operational logs. Any of these could fall under the broad description of "internal files." Because the public record does not name concrete data categories beyond that phrase, it is not possible to state with certainty what was taken. Readers should treat claims of specific personal or financial data as unsubstantiated until corroborated by the organisation or independent investigators.

What's at stake

For individuals whose information may have been among the internal files, the practical risks include targeted phishing, social-engineering attempts that reference real internal details, and potential identity-related misuse if personal identifiers were present. Because the scale is unknown, the number of people who might face these risks cannot be quantified.

For the organisation, the stakes centre on operational continuity, regulatory obligations, and trust with customers who depend on satellite links for safety-critical communications. Exposure of internal technical files could assist further intrusion attempts or competitive intelligence gathering. Reputational damage and the cost of investigation and remediation are common consequences even when the full extent of data loss stays limited. None of these outcomes are confirmed; they represent the ordinary range of impacts associated with ransomware claims against communications providers.

Were you affected?

If you have an email address or account associated with Inmarsat services, monitor for unexpected password-reset messages, unusual login alerts, or phishing emails that reference satellite or maritime topics. Change passwords on any related accounts, enable multi-factor authentication where available, and treat unsolicited requests for credentials with caution. Organisations that believe they may have been impacted should follow their internal incident-response procedures and consult official notifications rather than relying solely on third-party listings.

Readers can also run a free exposure scan of their email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach data sets. Such scans provide an early indication of wider exposure but do not confirm or rule out involvement in this specific incident, whose details remain limited.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companyinmarsat.com security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See inmarsat.com’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

sp.tnitelecom.com Listed by babuk2 Ransomware GroupMarch 18, 2025Orange.com Listed by babuk2 Ransomware GroupMarch 16, 2025movistar.com.pe Listed by babuk2 Ransomware GroupMarch 14, 2025India's telecommunication network Listed by babuk2 Ransomware GroupMarch 12, 2025

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the inmarsat.com Listed by babuk2 Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by babuk2 — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram