LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › https://www.labusinessjournal.com Listed by royal Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

https://www.labusinessjournal.com Listed by royal Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·November 24, 2022
https://www.labusinessjournal.com Listed by royal Ransomware Group

Reported November 24, 2022.

HIGH
Severity
November 24, 2022
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The https://www.labusinessjournal.com Listed by royal Ransomware Group (reported November 24, 2022) is an unverified claim; the data involved is undisclosed belonging to roughly unknown people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

On November 24, 2022, the website https://www.labusinessjournal.com appeared on a leak site operated by the Royal ransomware group. The group claims to have stolen internal data from the organization in a ransomware attack. Public detail remains limited: the number of people affected is unknown, and no independent confirmation of the claim has been widely reported.

Listings of this kind matter because they signal a potential exposure of internal material that could affect staff, partners, or sources connected to a regional business publication. Until more is verified, the incident stands as an unverified claim by the threat actor rather than a fully documented breach.

What happened

According to available reporting, https://www.labusinessjournal.com was listed on the Royal ransomware leak site on or around November 24, 2022. The group claims to have exfiltrated internal files during a ransomware attack. No public information confirms the precise date of intrusion, the method of initial access, the volume of data taken, or whether any ransom demand was paid or refused. The scale of impact on individuals is undisclosed. What is known is confined to the leak-site listing itself and the group's assertion that internal data was stolen.

Who is royal?

Royal is a ransomware operation that became publicly visible in 2022. Like many contemporaneous groups, it has typically relied on double-extortion tactics: encrypting systems while also claiming to copy data beforehand, then threatening to publish the material if payment is not made. The group has been observed using common initial-access routes such as phishing, exploitation of exposed remote services, or compromised credentials, though specific techniques vary by incident. Royal has listed multiple organizations across sectors on its leak site. In this case, the listing of https://www.labusinessjournal.com constitutes a claim by the group; it does not by itself prove the full extent or success of any intrusion.

https://www.labusinessjournal.com Listed by royal Ransomware Group and its sector

https://www.labusinessjournal.com is associated with the Los Angeles Business Journal, a regional business publication that covers commercial, economic, and corporate activity in the Los Angeles area. Organizations of this type routinely handle internal editorial files, subscriber or advertiser records, correspondence with sources, and operational documents. A breach claim against a business journal is consequential because such outlets often maintain contact lists, unpublished reporting material, and business relationships that extend beyond their immediate staff. Even when the precise contents remain unconfirmed, the mere assertion of internal-file theft raises questions about continuity of operations and the confidentiality of professional communications.

The information in question

The facts state that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No further breakdown of file types, record counts, or categories of personal information has been disclosed. Organizations in the business-media sector typically hold employee data, contributor or source contact details, subscription and advertising records, draft articles, and internal administrative documents. Whether any of those categories were among the material Royal claims to have taken is unconfirmed. Readers should treat the exposed-data description as limited to the group's general claim of internal files rather than a verified inventory.

Why it matters

For individuals whose information may have been held by the organization, the practical risks include potential misuse of contact details, targeted phishing that references internal knowledge, or exposure of professional affiliations. For the organization itself, a ransomware incident can disrupt publishing schedules, strain relationships with sources and advertisers, and create lasting uncertainty about what left the network. Because the number of people affected remains unknown and the exact contents are unconfirmed, the immediate harm cannot be quantified from public information alone. The listing nevertheless serves as a reminder that regional media outlets, like other mid-sized enterprises, are attractive targets for groups seeking leverage through stolen internal material.

If your data was in this claimed breach

If you have a past or present connection to the Los Angeles Business Journal or its digital properties—as staff, contributor, subscriber, advertiser, or source—consider the following practical steps:

Public detail on this incident is limited. Further clarity will depend on any official statements from the organization or additional verified reporting. Until then, measured caution and routine account hygiene remain the most useful responses.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Attributed to

Method

More recent breaches

https://naulty.com Listed by royal Ransomware GroupNovember 18, 2022http://bfernandez.com Listed by royal Ransomware GroupNovember 11, 2022http://ivacorm.com Listed by royal Ransomware GroupNovember 7, 2022http://www.sheehanfamilycompanies.com Listed by royal Ransomware GroupNovember 7, 2022

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the https://www.labusinessjournal.com Listed by royal Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by royal — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram