LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › dad Listed by warlock Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

dad Listed by warlock Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·June 11, 2025
dad Listed by warlock Ransomware Group

Reported June 11, 2025.

HIGH
Severity
June 11, 2025
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

dad was listed by the warlock Ransomware Group on June 11, 2025. An undisclosed number of people may have been affected; review any notices you receive and change passwords or enable extra security if you hold an account with the organisation.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

On June 11, 2025, the organisation known as dad was listed by the ransomware group warlock. Public reporting indicates that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack, though the number of people affected remains unknown and further details about the incident have not been disclosed.

This listing places dad among organisations whose data has been claimed by a ransomware actor. Because the exact scale, method and contents of any compromise are unconfirmed, the practical consequences for individuals connected to dad cannot yet be measured with precision. What is known so far is limited to the group's claim and the statement that internal files were taken.

Breaking down the breach

According to available information, dad was listed by warlock on or around June 11, 2025. The only data type named as exposed is internal files said to have been exfiltrated during a ransomware attack. No figure has been given for the number of people affected, no timeline of the intrusion has been released, and no technical description of how access was obtained has been made public. The reported summary of the incident is listed as unavailable. In short, the public record consists of the listing itself and the assertion that internal files left the organisation; everything else remains undisclosed.

The group behind it: warlock

Warlock is a ransomware group that operates in the familiar double-extortion model used by many contemporary actors. Groups of this type typically gain access to a network, move laterally, exfiltrate data, encrypt systems, and then publish the victim's name on a dedicated leak site while threatening to release the stolen material if a ransom is not paid. Public reporting on warlock has documented this pattern of behaviour across multiple claimed victims. In the present case the group claims that dad suffered a ransomware attack in which internal files were taken; that claim has not been independently verified in the material available here. No additional statements attributed to warlock about this specific organisation appear in the facts.

Who is dad?

Public detail about the organisation simply named "dad" is limited. No sector, size, location or business description is supplied in the available record. Organisations of any kind that become targets of ransomware typically hold a mixture of operational documents, employee records, customer or client information, financial data and internal communications. A breach involving such material can affect both the organisation's day-to-day functioning and the privacy of people whose details appear in those files. Because the precise nature of dad is not described, the full range of potential consequences cannot be mapped with certainty; the listing alone is enough to indicate that the organisation has been drawn into a ransomware incident of claimed significance.

What was likely exposed

The facts state only that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No inventory of those files, no categories of personal data, and no confirmation of specific record types have been released. Organisations generally maintain internal files that may include staff directories, contracts, project documents, system configurations, correspondence and, in many cases, personal information about employees, partners or clients. Whether any of those categories were present among the material claimed by warlock is unconfirmed. Readers should treat the exact contents as unknown until further official disclosure occurs.

The real-world impact

For people whose information may have been among the internal files, the principal risks are identity misuse, targeted phishing, and the longer-term possibility that personal details appear in secondary criminal markets. Even when the precise data set is unknown, the mere fact of an exfiltration claim can prompt fraudsters to craft more convincing messages that reference the organisation. For dad itself the consequences typically include operational disruption, the cost of investigation and recovery, potential regulatory scrutiny if personal data were involved, and reputational damage arising from the public listing. None of these outcomes can be quantified from the current facts; they remain the standard range of effects observed after ransomware claims of this kind.

Were you affected?

If you have any past or present connection to dad—as an employee, contractor, client or partner—treat the listing as a prompt to review your own exposure. Change passwords that may have been reused, enable multi-factor authentication wherever available, and monitor financial and email accounts for unusual activity. You can also run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach data sets. Until more detail is published, these basic steps remain the most practical response available to individuals.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companydad security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See dad’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

silanosn.local Listed by warlock Ransomware GroupNovember 6, 2025bel.quadra.ru Listed by warlock Ransomware GroupNovember 6, 2025sf.walltopia.com Listed by warlock Ransomware GroupNovember 6, 2025alphasys.bo Listed by warlock Ransomware GroupNovember 6, 2025

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the dad Listed by warlock Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by warlock — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram