LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › c****gl*b*.com Listed by devman Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

c****gl*b*.com Listed by devman Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·July 5, 2025
c****gl*b*.com Listed by devman Ransomware Group

Reported July 5, 2025.

HIGH
Severity
July 5, 2025
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

c****gl*b*.com was listed by the devman ransomware group on July 05, 2025, after internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. An undisclosed number of people may have been affected; check the organisation’s notices and monitor accounts for unusual activity.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

On 5 July 2025 the ransomware group known as devman listed c****gl*b*.com on its leak site. Public reporting states that internal files were exfiltrated during a ransomware attack and associates a figure of 1 000 000 USD with the incident. The number of people affected is unknown, and independent confirmation of the group’s claims has not been published.

Because the listing is the principal public record, the full scope of the event remains limited to what the group has asserted and what has been reported. That limited record is still enough to warrant attention from anyone whose information may have been held by the organisation.

Inside the incident

According to the available record, c****gl*b*.com was listed by the devman ransomware group on 5 July 2025. The group claims that internal files were taken in a ransomware attack. A reported summary figure of 1 000 000 USD has been attached to the listing; public detail does not clarify whether this represents a ransom demand, an estimated loss, or another valuation. The number of individuals whose data may have been involved is listed as unknown. No technical description of the intrusion method, the precise date of the initial compromise, or the volume of data removed has been released. All statements about the breach therefore rest on the group’s leak-site claim and the sparse accompanying report.

Inside devman

Devman is a ransomware operation that follows the now-common double-extortion model: systems are encrypted and data are simultaneously copied so that the threat of public release can be used to pressure the victim. Like other groups of this type, it maintains a leak site on which it posts the names of organisations it claims to have compromised, often accompanied by sample files or countdown timers. Public reporting on prior activity shows that the group typically targets a range of commercial and institutional victims, demands payment in cryptocurrency, and occasionally releases data when negotiations fail. Nothing in the public record states that the specific claims made about c****gl*b*.com have been independently verified; the listing itself remains an assertion by the group.

c****gl*b*.com and its sector

Public detail on the precise nature of c****gl*b*.com is limited. The domain indicates a commercial or organisational web presence. Organisations operating under such domains commonly maintain internal administrative files, correspondence, financial records, employee information and, depending on their line of work, customer or client data. A ransomware incident that involves the exfiltration of internal files therefore carries potential consequences for both the organisation’s operations and any individuals whose personal or business information may have been stored in those files. The absence of fuller public description of the organisation’s activities does not reduce the practical importance of the claimed data loss.

The information in question

The only data type named in the public record is “internal files” said to have been exfiltrated. No inventory of file names, categories or record counts has been released, and the number of people affected remains unknown. Organisations of this general type typically hold documents that can include staff details, contractual material, financial statements and operational records. Whether any of those categories were among the files taken, and whether personal data of customers or employees were included, is unconfirmed. Until a more detailed disclosure appears, the exact contents of the claimed exfiltration cannot be stated as fact.

Why it matters

When internal files leave an organisation’s control, the immediate risks are misuse of any personal or commercial information they contain, potential fraud against individuals named in the documents, and operational disruption for the organisation itself. Even if the files prove to be largely administrative, they can still supply attackers with enough context to craft convincing phishing messages or to identify further targets. For the organisation, the incident can mean regulatory scrutiny, remediation costs and loss of trust. Because the scale of exposure is listed as unknown, the prudent assumption is that anyone who has had a relationship with c****gl*b*.com—employees, contractors or clients—should treat the possibility of data exposure seriously until clearer information emerges.

If your data was in this claimed breach

If you believe your information may have been held by c****gl*b*.com, the following practical steps are advisable:

Readers can also run a free exposure scan of their email address to check whether that address has already appeared in known breach data sets. Such a scan does not confirm or rule out involvement in this specific incident, but it provides an additional, independent check against publicly circulating breach collections.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companyc****gl*b*.com security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See c****gl*b*.com’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

***-***tems.*** Listed by devman Ransomware GroupDecember 14, 2025arko.no Listed by devman Ransomware GroupDecember 6, 2025n*w*****.com Listed by devman Ransomware GroupDecember 2, 2025m*tt**ca**r**.**.it Listed by devman Ransomware GroupDecember 1, 2025

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the c****gl*b*.com Listed by devman Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by devman — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram