LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

CVE-2023-29552: Service Location Protocol (SLP) Denial-of-Service Vulnerability

RBRecent Breaches Vulnerability Intelligence·Nov 8, 2023
High⚠ Actively exploited (CISA KEV)
High
Severity
Active
CISA KEV
No
Ransomware use
Nov 29, 2023
Patch deadline
⚠ Exploited in the wild. CISA added CVE-2023-29552 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Nov 8, 2023, with a federal patch deadline of Nov 29, 2023 — meaning attackers are actively using it. If you run the affected software, patch it immediately.

The Service Location Protocol (SLP) contains a denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to register services and use spoofed UDP traffic to conduct a…

CVE-2023-29552 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in the IETF Service Location Protocol (SLP). An unauthenticated remote attacker can register services and abuse spoofed UDP traffic to generate a DoS attack with a significant amplification factor. This matters because SLP is often enabled by default on systems that perform service discovery, and exposure of the protocol on untrusted networks can turn ordinary hosts into amplifiers that disrupt availability for others or for the target itself.

Defenders should treat any internet-facing or untrusted-network instance of SLP as high priority until the service is disabled or the vendor-recommended mitigations are confirmed in place.

How it works

The vulnerability class is a denial-of-service condition that arises from the way SLP handles service registration and UDP-based traffic. According to the public description, an unauthenticated remote attacker can register services and then use spoofed UDP packets to produce amplified traffic directed at a victim. Because the protocol relies on UDP and does not require authentication for these operations, the attacker can generate a large volume of responses relative to the size of the original request. Exact packet formats, amplification ratios, and implementation-specific triggers are not detailed here; teams must consult the relevant vendor advisory for the precise mechanics that apply to their products.

In practical terms, the attack does not require prior access or credentials. Any system that accepts SLP traffic on the network can be leveraged, making open port 427/UDP a primary risk indicator.

Am I affected? How to find it in your systems

SLP is used for service discovery and may be present on servers, workstations, network appliances, or embedded devices that advertise or locate network services. It commonly listens on UDP port 427. Inventory efforts should therefore focus on identifying hosts that have the SLP service running or that accept traffic on that port.

If SLP is not required for business functions, treat its presence on any untrusted network interface as an exposure that needs immediate attention.

How to remediate

The primary remediation path is to follow the vendor’s instructions for the affected product. Where a software update is available, apply it promptly and verify that the SLP service no longer exhibits the vulnerable behavior. The CISA-required action states that organizations should apply mitigations per vendor instructions or disable the SLP service or port 427/UDP on all systems running on untrusted networks, including those directly connected to the Internet.

After changes, re-scan to ensure the port is closed and the service is no longer listening where it should not be.

If you can't patch immediately

When an immediate vendor update or full disable is not feasible, apply compensating controls that reduce the attack surface and limit amplification potential.

These measures buy time but do not replace the need to apply the permanent vendor mitigation or to remove the service from untrusted exposure.

If your data may have been exposed

This vulnerability is a denial-of-service issue; the public description does not document ransomware use or direct data exfiltration. Nevertheless, any actively exploited vulnerability can be a foothold for broader compromise. If systems running SLP were internet-facing or otherwise exposed, review logs for signs of abuse and treat the incident as a potential availability and lateral-movement risk. Organizations can also run a free exposure scan of their email addresses against known breach data sets to determine whether credentials or other information associated with their domain have appeared in prior incidents.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Details

AffectedIETF · Service Location Protocol (SLP)
Added to CISA KEVNov 8, 2023
Federal patch deadlineNov 29, 2023
Known ransomware useNot documented
Check if your data is exposed →

Official records: NVD · CISA KEV

← All actively-exploited vulnerabilities