Studio Notarile Associato Salvatore Costantino E Anna Favarato Listed by Emperador Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

A ransomware group known as Emperador has listed Studio Notarile Associato Salvatore Costantino E Anna Favarato on its leak site, describing a notary practice in Follina, Italy, and asserting that a substantial volume of material is involved. The organisation has not publicly confirmed the claim as of writing. For clients, counterparties, and staff who deal with Italian notarial offices, the practical question is conditional: if records of the kind such offices hold were copied, personal and transactional information could be misused for fraud, impersonation, or long-term identity risk.

Public detail is limited. Emperador’s listing is an unverified claim. It does not by itself prove that systems were compromised, that files left the firm, or that the described contents are accurate. Readers should treat the following as a report of what the group has published, not as an established inventory of a claimed breach.

What the listing says

According to the listing, Emperador has named Studio Notarile Associato Salvatore Costantino E Anna Favarato, with an address given as Piazza Iv Novembre, 20, 31051 Follina, Italia, and a telephone number associated with the practice. The group’s text describes the target as a notary’s office and claims “several thousand documents,” stating that there are “many customer documents and employee data.” The listing cites a data size of 7.1 GB and assigns sectors labelled Finance and Other. It also states a scheduled publication time of 2026-09-30 08:30:04 UTC. The report date associated with the listing is September 20, 2026.

The number of people affected is unknown. The listing does not disclose a technical method of intrusion, a timeline of alleged access, or a confirmed inventory of file types beyond the broad phrases above. Exact data categories beyond the group’s marketing language remain undisclosed. Nothing in the public listing has been independently verified in the material provided for this article, and the company has not publicly stated the incident as of writing.

Who is Emperador?

Emperador is known in public reporting as a ransomware and extortion-style actor that pressures organisations by threatening to publish material it claims to have taken. Groups in this category typically combine encryption or access claims with leak-site postings, countdowns, and descriptions meant to increase urgency for the named victim and for anyone who might recognise themselves in the claimed data. Tactics commonly associated with such crews include double-extortion narratives—alleging both operational disruption and data theft—though each listing must be judged on its own evidence, which is often thin from the outside.

For this specific entry, only what appears on the listing should be attributed to the group: it claims a notary office listing, a multi-gigabyte volume, customer and employee-related material, and a publication schedule. No further statements by Emperador about this victim are established in the facts available here. Leak-site posts can be exaggerated, recycled, incomplete, or false; they are a form of pressure, not a court finding or a regulator’s notice.

Studio Notarile Associato Salvatore Costantino E Anna Favarato and its sector

Studio Notarile Associato Salvatore Costantino E Anna Favarato is identified in the listing as a notarial practice in Follina, Italy. In Italy, notaries (notai) are public officers who authenticate deeds, oversee property transfers, company formations, wills, powers of attorney, and other high-stakes legal acts. Their files routinely sit at the intersection of identity, property, family, and commercial law.

A leak-site claim against a notary’s office matters because the sector’s work product is inherently sensitive. Even when an incident is unconfirmed, the type of organisation named explains why clients pay attention: notarial archives are trusted repositories of documents people rarely want circulating outside formal channels. A listing does not establish that any particular file left the firm; it does establish that a named extortion group has chosen to associate that firm with a public pressure campaign.

What data was at risk

The facts do not confirm that any specific dataset was taken. Emperador’s listing uses general wording—“several thousand documents,” “customer documents,” and “employee data”—and a claimed size of 7.1 GB. Those phrases are the group’s description, not a verified catalogue.

If files from a notarial practice were ever copied, organisations in this sector typically hold materials such as identity details tied to deeds, property and mortgage-related paperwork, corporate formation records, succession and family-status documents, contact data for clients and counterparties, and internal employment records. Whether any of that applies here is unconfirmed. Readers should not assume their own files are in the claimed set; they should also not assume the claim is empty. The honest position is that exact contents are undisclosed and unverified.

What's at stake

For individuals, the conditional risks are concrete. If customer documents of the kind notaries handle may have been exposed, possible outcomes include targeted phishing that references real transactions, attempts to open credit or divert payments using authentic-looking personal details, property- or inheritance-related social engineering, and longer-lived identity misuse. Employee-related data, if involved, can support payroll fraud, credential stuffing against work accounts, or harassment. None of these outcomes is proven by a listing alone; they are the usual harm pathways when such records do circulate.

For the organisation, a public extortion listing can mean reputational pressure, client concern, and the operational cost of investigating and responding—again, regardless of whether every claim on the leak site is accurate. A listing establishes that a threat actor is making a public accusation and setting a publication clock. It does not, by itself, establish negligence, confirm exfiltration, or fix the scope of any incident.

If your data was involved

Because the incident is unconfirmed and the affected population is unknown, treat the following as precautions if you have a relationship with this practice or believe your documents may have been among those the group describes:

• Contact the studio through a channel you already trust (known phone number or in-person inquiry) and ask whether it has issued any official notice; do not rely on links or attachments from unexpected messages.
• Watch for emails, calls, or messages that cite notarial acts, property deals, or personal details you would only expect a notary to know; verify independently before sending money or documents.
• If you used the same email or password elsewhere, change those passwords and enable multi-factor authentication where available.
• Review bank, credit, and property-related correspondence for unfamiliar activity; in Italy, consider free or low-cost credit monitoring options available to consumers where applicable.
• Retain copies of any official communications you receive from the firm or from authorities; ignore payment demands from parties claiming to “hold” your file unless you have verified them through official channels.
• You can run a free exposure scan of your email to check whether your address has appeared in known breach datasets—an extra signal, not proof about this specific listing.

Emperador has listed Studio Notarile Associato Salvatore Costantino E Anna Favarato and claims a multi-gigabyte set of customer and employee-related documents with a publication schedule in late September 2026. The firm has not publicly confirmed the claim as of writing. Until independent confirmation exists, the responsible stance is caution without treating the leak-site post as settled fact.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.