stjerome.org Listed by safepay Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do
stjerome.org was listed by the safepay ransomware group on February 05, 2025, with internal files reported as exfiltrated; the date of the intrusion itself has not been established. Anyone connected to the organisation should verify whether their information was involved and take appropriate protective steps.
On February 05, 2025, the ransomware group safepay listed stjerome.org on its leak site, claiming responsibility for a ransomware attack in which internal files were exfiltrated. Public reporting provides no confirmed figure for the number of people affected, and further operational details remain limited.
The listing itself constitutes a claim by the group rather than independently verified confirmation of the full scope or success of any intrusion. For individuals or communities linked to entities using the stjerome.org name, the report nonetheless warrants attention because religious and educational organizations of this type commonly hold personal and administrative records.
Breaking down the breach
According to the available record, stjerome.org was listed by the safepay ransomware group on February 05, 2025. The sole data description supplied is that internal files were allegedly exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No public information has been released on the precise date of any intrusion, the method of initial access, the volume of data taken, encryption status of systems, or whether a ransom demand was issued or paid. The number of people affected is listed as unknown. All specifics beyond the group’s leak-site claim and the characterization of the material as internal files remain undisclosed.
The group behind it: safepay
Safepay is a ransomware operation that has been observed conducting double-extortion campaigns: encrypting victim systems while simultaneously stealing data and threatening to publish it on a dedicated leak site if payment is not made. Like other groups in this category, it typically advertises victims on its dark-web portal to apply pressure. Public tracking of safepay activity shows a pattern of opportunistic targeting across sectors rather than exclusive focus on any single industry. In the present case, the group’s listing of stjerome.org should be treated as an unverified claim; no independent confirmation of the intrusion’s success or the authenticity of any posted samples has been supplied in the available facts.
Who is stjerome.org?
Public information about stjerome.org is sparse. Available descriptions indicate that the domain appears to belong to a non-existent or unrecognized commercial company, while the name “St. Jerome” is historically and commonly associated with Roman Catholic churches, schools, or related religious institutions. Organizations of this character typically manage parish or school records, donor information, staff and volunteer details, and administrative correspondence. A breach involving such an entity can therefore affect congregants, families, employees, or donors even when the precise legal status of the domain remains unclear. The limited public footprint of stjerome.org itself means that independent verification of its operations and data holdings is difficult.
The information in question
The facts state only that internal files were exfiltrated. No inventory of specific data types—such as names, contact details, financial records, or identity documents—has been disclosed. Organizations linked to religious or educational missions under the St. Jerome name commonly maintain membership rolls, sacramental or enrollment records, payroll and personnel files, and donor databases. Whether any of those categories were among the files taken remains unconfirmed. Readers should therefore treat the exact contents as unknown pending further official disclosure.
Why it matters
When internal files leave an organization’s control, the practical risks include unauthorized use of personal contact information for phishing or social-engineering attempts, potential exposure of financial or identity data if such records were present, and reputational or operational disruption for the institution itself. For individuals, the immediate concern is that any personal details held by the organization could later appear in secondary markets or be used to craft convincing fraudulent messages. For the organization, recovery may involve system restoration, notification obligations where applicable, and the need to reassess access controls—steps whose cost and complexity scale with the still-unknown volume of material involved. Because the number of affected people is unreported, the full human impact cannot yet be quantified.
Were you affected?
If you have ever been associated with a parish, school, or other entity operating under the stjerome.org name or a similar St. Jerome designation, treat the report as a prompt for caution rather than confirmed personal exposure. Monitor financial and email accounts for unusual activity, enable multi-factor authentication where available, and be skeptical of unexpected messages that reference church or school matters. You can also run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach data sets. Official notifications, if any are issued by the organization, should be regarded as the authoritative source of further guidance.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
aspenviewacademy.org Listed by safepay Ransomware Grouppellcityschools.net Listed by safepay Ransomware Groupkillinglyschools.org Listed by safepay Ransomware Groupdoversd.org Listed by safepay Ransomware GroupLatest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the stjerome.org Listed by safepay Ransomware Group →
Publicly posted by safepay — unverified claim, pending independent verification
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.