sole technology Listed by monti Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

On February 11, 2025, the ransomware group known as Monti listed Sole Technology on its leak site, claiming a full leak of internal files obtained through a ransomware attack. Public reporting so far identifies the incident as involving the exfiltration of internal files, with the number of people affected remaining unknown and no further Reported Details released about timing, entry method, or precise scale.

The listing itself is a claim by the group rather than independently verified confirmation of every asserted detail. For an organisation in the footwear and apparel sector, any such exposure of internal material carries practical consequences for employees, partners and customers whose information may have been held in company systems.

Inside the incident

According to the available record, Sole Technology was listed by the Monti ransomware group on February 11, 2025. The reported summary characterises the event as a full leak, with data types named as internal files that were allegedly exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No public figure has been given for the number of individuals affected, and details such as the exact date of intrusion, the initial access vector, the volume of data taken, or any ransom demand remain undisclosed.

What is known is limited to the group's claim of having obtained and prepared internal files for release. There is no confirmed independent verification in the public facts of the completeness of that claim or of any subsequent publication of the material. Organisations facing ransomware listings of this type typically confront both encryption of systems and the threat of data release; in this case the public record emphasises the exfiltration component.

The group behind it: monti

Monti is a ransomware operation that became active in the period following the disruption of the Conti group, with which it has been publicly linked through shared tactics and infrastructure patterns. Like many contemporary ransomware actors, Monti is known for double-extortion methods: encrypting victim systems while also stealing data and threatening to publish it on a dedicated leak site if payment is not made. The group has previously listed organisations across multiple sectors, using the public posting of victim names and sample files as leverage.

In the present case the group claims to have listed Sole Technology and to have prepared a full leak of internal files. That claim should be treated as an assertion by the actors rather than established fact until corroborated. Monti's typical pattern involves posting victim details and, in some instances, releasing portions of stolen data over time; whether that sequence has occurred here beyond the initial listing is not detailed in the available facts.

Who is sole technology?

Sole Technology is a company operating in the action-sports footwear and apparel sector, known for brands associated with skateboarding and related lifestyle products. Organisations of this kind maintain corporate systems that commonly hold employee records, supplier and wholesale partner information, design and manufacturing data, e-commerce customer details, and internal financial or operational documents.

A breach involving internal files is consequential because such material can include both commercial secrets and personal data belonging to staff, contractors and customers. Even when the precise contents remain unconfirmed, the mere listing of a company of this profile raises the possibility that sensitive operational and personal information has left controlled systems.

What was likely exposed

The facts name the exposed material as internal files exfiltrated in a ransomware attack and describe the event as a full leak. No more granular inventory—such as specific file categories, record counts, or named data fields—has been disclosed. Exact contents therefore remain unconfirmed.

Companies in the footwear and apparel sector typically store employee personally identifiable information, payroll and benefits data, customer account and order records from e-commerce platforms, wholesale and retailer contact lists, product design files, contracts, and internal communications. Any or all of these categories could theoretically be present among internal files, but public detail does not establish which ones, if any, were actually taken. Readers should treat claims of comprehensive exposure as unverified until further evidence appears.

What's at stake

For individuals whose data may have been among the internal files, the practical risks include potential misuse of personal details for phishing, identity fraud or targeted social engineering. Employees could face exposure of home addresses, national identifiers or banking information if such records were present; customers could see order histories or contact data surface in secondary markets. Because the number of people affected is unknown and the precise data types unconfirmed, the scale of these risks cannot yet be quantified.

For Sole Technology the stakes include operational disruption from any encryption that accompanied the exfiltration, reputational harm from the public listing, possible regulatory notification duties, and the longer-term cost of investigating, containing and remediating the incident. Partners and suppliers whose information resided in shared systems may also face secondary exposure. None of these outcomes is asserted as having already materialised beyond the group's claim; they represent the ordinary consequences that follow ransomware listings of this nature.

Were you affected?

If you are a current or former employee, customer or business partner of Sole Technology, monitor account statements and credit reports for unusual activity and treat unsolicited messages that reference the company with caution. Change passwords on any accounts that reused credentials associated with Sole Technology systems, and enable multi-factor authentication where available. Official notifications, if required, would normally come from the organisation itself or from regulators; until such notice arrives, assume only that the group's claim exists and that internal files were asserted to have been taken.

Readers can also run a free exposure scan of their email address to check whether that address has already appeared in known breach data sets. Such a scan does not confirm or rule out involvement in this specific incident, but it provides a practical starting point for personal monitoring while further public details remain limited.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.