randi-group.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do
The randi-group.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group (reported February 28, 2024) is an unverified claim; the data involved is undisclosed belonging to roughly unknown people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.
People whose information may sit inside Randi Group systems face practical uncertainty after the company appeared on a ransomware leak site. On 28 February 2024 the lockbit3 group publicly listed randi-group.com and claimed it had exfiltrated internal files during a ransomware attack. The number of individuals affected remains unknown and public detail is limited, so anyone who has dealt with the firm—employees, suppliers, customers—has reason to treat the claim seriously and watch for signs that personal or business data could be misused.
Because the listing itself is an unverified assertion by the attackers, the full scope of what was taken and whether any data has been released is still unconfirmed. That gap leaves ordinary people without clear answers about their own exposure while the organisation assesses the incident.
Inside the incident
According to the available record, randi-group.com was listed by the lockbit3 ransomware group on 28 February 2024. The group claims that internal files were exfiltrated as part of a ransomware attack. No further technical details—such as the initial access method, the precise date the intrusion began, the volume of data removed, or confirmation that any files have been published—have been disclosed in the public summary. The number of people whose information may be involved is listed as unknown. At present the only concrete assertion is the leak-site listing itself and the statement that internal files were taken.
Ransomware incidents of this type typically involve encryption of systems combined with data theft, after which the attackers threaten to publish the material unless a ransom is paid. In this case, public sources provide no confirmation that encryption occurred, that a ransom demand was issued, or that any negotiation took place. The record simply notes the listing and the claim of exfiltrated internal files. Until the organisation or independent investigators release additional verified information, those elements remain undisclosed.
Inside lockbit3
Lockbit3 is a well-documented ransomware operation that has been active for several years under successive versions of the LockBit brand. The group is known for a double-extortion model: it encrypts victims’ systems and simultaneously steals data, then threatens to publish the stolen material on a dedicated leak site if payment is not received. Affiliates often carry out the initial intrusion and encryption while the core operators manage the leak infrastructure and negotiations. The group has previously claimed responsibility for attacks across manufacturing, professional services, healthcare and other sectors, frequently posting sample files or full data dumps when victims do not pay.
Lockbit3’s public leak site serves as both pressure tool and proof of compromise. Listings typically include the victim’s name or domain, a short description, and sometimes screenshots or file trees. Because the site is controlled by the attackers, every claim it makes about a specific victim—including the assertion that internal files from randi-group.com were exfiltrated—must be treated as an unverified claim unless independently confirmed. The group’s history shows that some listings are later withdrawn after payment or negotiation, while others result in partial or full data releases. No such outcome has been reported for this particular listing in the available facts.
Who is randi-group.com?
Randi Group presents itself as a company focused on natural products extracted from grapes, emphasising shared values that bind the group. Organisations of this kind typically operate in the food-ingredient, nutraceutical or agricultural-processing sector, handling raw materials, production processes, quality documentation, supplier contracts and customer orders. They commonly maintain databases of employees, business partners, logistics details and proprietary formulations.
A breach at such a firm is consequential because the data it holds often includes both commercial secrets and personal information belonging to staff and counterparties. Even if the company is not a household consumer brand, disruption to its systems can affect supply chains, delay orders and expose individuals who never expected their details to leave the organisation’s control. The limited public description does not expand on size, locations or exact product lines, so those specifics remain outside the confirmed record.
What data was at risk
The facts state only that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No inventory of file types, no count of records, and no confirmation of personal data categories have been disclosed. Organisations that extract and commercialise natural products from grapes typically store employee records, payroll information, supplier and customer contact details, contracts, shipping documents, quality-control reports and proprietary process data. Any of those categories could theoretically have been among the internal files, yet the exact contents remain unconfirmed.
Because the number of people affected is listed as unknown and no data samples have been described in the public summary, it is not possible to state with certainty which individuals or which specific data elements are involved. Readers should therefore treat the exposure as potential rather than proven until further verified information appears.
Why it matters
For people whose details may have been inside the exfiltrated files, the practical risks include targeted phishing, identity fraud, or unsolicited contact that leverages knowledge of their relationship with Randi Group. Business partners could face competitive harm if pricing, contracts or formulations become public. The organisation itself faces operational disruption, potential regulatory scrutiny depending on jurisdiction, and the longer-term cost of restoring systems and trust.
These consequences do not require sensational language; they follow directly from the nature of internal corporate files and the established behaviour of ransomware groups that publish stolen data. Until the full scope is known, both individuals and the company must operate under the assumption that some material may already be in unauthorised hands.
What to do if you're exposed
If you have worked for, supplied, or bought from Randi Group, begin by monitoring financial accounts and email for unusual activity. Enable multi-factor authentication on important accounts and treat unexpected messages that reference the company with caution. Consider placing fraud alerts with credit agencies if you believe personal identifiers could be involved. Keep records of any suspicious contact so you can report it later if needed.
You can also run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach data sets. That step provides an immediate, concrete way to assess whether your information has surfaced elsewhere and helps you decide what further protective measures to take while official details remain limited.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
orsiniimballaggi.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Groupgruppozaccaria.it Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Grouptsebrakes.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Groupmarmon-herrington.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware GroupLatest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the randi-group.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group →
Publicly posted by lockbit — unverified claim, pending independent verification
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.