quintal.com.co Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do
The quintal.com.co Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group (reported September 14, 2022) is an unverified claim; the data involved is undisclosed belonging to roughly unknown people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.
Ransomware groups continued through 2022 to publish victim names on dedicated leak sites as a pressure tactic, turning data theft into both an operational and reputational event. In that climate, the appearance of a Colombian domain on a prominent ransomware blog was one more signal that internal corporate material remained a high-value target for extortion crews.
On 14 September 2022, quintal.com.co was listed by the LockBit3 ransomware group. The group claims to have stolen internal data in a ransomware attack. Public detail on the incident remains limited: the number of people affected is unknown, and no independent confirmation of the theft or its full scope has been widely reported. For anyone connected to the organisation, the listing itself is reason enough to understand what is claimed and what practical steps follow.
Breaking down the breach
According to available records, quintal.com.co appeared on the LockBit3 leak site on 14 September 2022. The group’s listing asserts that internal files were exfiltrated during a ransomware attack and that the stolen material was being held as leverage. No public figure has been given for the volume of data, the number of systems involved, or the precise date the intrusion began. The count of individuals whose information may have been exposed is listed as unknown.
Ransomware incidents of this type typically combine encryption of systems with prior theft of files, after which the operators threaten to publish or sell the material if payment demands are not met. In this case, the only concrete public claim is the leak-site entry itself. Whether the data was later released, whether negotiations occurred, or whether the organisation confirmed the intrusion has not been detailed in the records used for this account. Timing beyond the September 2022 listing date, technical method of entry, and any ransom figure remain undisclosed.
The group behind it: lockbit3
LockBit3 is the name associated with a long-running ransomware operation that has repeatedly appeared in public reporting since earlier LockBit iterations. The group is known for a Ransomware-as-a-Service model in which affiliates conduct intrusions and share proceeds with the core developers. Its operators have historically maintained a dark-web leak site where they post victim names, countdown timers, and, in many cases, samples or full archives of stolen data when demands are not met.
Typical LockBit tactics documented across numerous incidents include exploitation of exposed remote-access services or unpatched vulnerabilities, theft of large volumes of files before encryption, and the dual threat of operational disruption plus public data exposure. The group has claimed responsibility for attacks against organisations in many countries and sectors. With respect to quintal.com.co specifically, the sole attribution in the public record is the leak-site listing; that listing constitutes the group’s claim that it stole internal data. No further statements by LockBit3 about this particular victim are recorded in the facts at hand.
Who is quintal.com.co?
quintal.com.co is an organisation operating under a Colombian country-code domain. Public background on the precise corporate structure or industry vertical is sparse in the breach record itself. Entities using such domains commonly include commercial, agricultural, logistics, or professional-services firms that maintain internal business records, correspondence, financial documents, and employee or customer information as part of ordinary operations.
A breach involving internal files at any organisation of this kind carries weight because those files often contain the operational backbone of the business—contracts, invoices, staff details, supplier data, and planning documents. Even without a confirmed headcount of affected individuals, the potential exposure of such material can affect employees, partners, and anyone whose personal or commercial information was stored in the organisation’s systems. The consequential nature of the incident therefore stems less from brand recognition and more from the ordinary sensitivity of internal corporate data.
The information in question
The facts state that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No more granular inventory—such as specific categories of personal data, financial records, or authentication credentials—has been publicly named. Organisations of this type typically hold employee records, customer or supplier contact details, internal communications, accounting files, and operational documents. Whether any or all of those categories were among the stolen material is unconfirmed.
Because the exact contents remain undisclosed, it is not possible to state as fact which data elements were taken. The LockBit3 claim is limited to the assertion that internal data was stolen. Readers should treat any more detailed descriptions circulating elsewhere as unverified unless corroborated by the organisation or by independent forensic reporting.
What's at stake
For individuals whose information may have been inside the exfiltrated files, the practical risks include targeted phishing that references real internal details, attempts at identity fraud if personal identifiers were present, and the longer-term possibility that the material could be reused or resold. Even routine business documents can supply enough context for convincing social-engineering attempts.
For the organisation, the stakes include operational disruption from any encryption that accompanied the theft, potential regulatory or contractual notification duties, erosion of trust among staff and partners, and the cost of investigation and remediation. Because the number of people affected is unknown and the precise data types are not confirmed, the full scale of harm cannot be quantified from public information alone. The incident nonetheless illustrates how a single ransomware claim can place both the entity and its wider circle of contacts under sustained uncertainty.
Were you affected?
If you have a past or present relationship with quintal.com.co—as an employee, contractor, customer, or supplier—treat the LockBit3 claim as a prompt to act cautiously. Monitor financial and email accounts for unusual activity, be sceptical of unexpected messages that appear to reference internal matters, and consider changing passwords used on any related systems, especially if those passwords were reused elsewhere. Enable multi-factor authentication wherever it is available.
You can also run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach datasets. That step will not confirm or rule out involvement in this specific incident, but it can indicate whether your address is circulating more broadly and help you prioritise further protections.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
lamejor.com.co Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Groupgruponutresa.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Groupagriobtentions.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Grouprkfoodland.com Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware GroupLatest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the quintal.com.co Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group →
Publicly posted by lockbit — unverified claim, pending independent verification
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.