LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › PuroClean Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

PuroClean Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·September 21, 2026
PuroClean Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware Group

Reported September 21, 2026.

HIGH
Severity
September 21, 2026
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

PuroClean was listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware Group on September 21, 2026. The group claims to hold data belonging to an undisclosed number of individuals; anyone who may have interacted with the company should review their accounts and monitor for unusual activity.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

A ransomware group known as The Gentlemen has listed PuroClean on its leak site, according to a report dated September 21, 2026. The listing names the company’s public web properties and describes the business, but it does not state that any systems were compromised or that any files left the company. PuroClean has not publicly confirmed the claim as of writing. For customers, franchise staff, insurers, and others who may have shared personal or claim-related information with a large restoration network, the practical question is straightforward: if data were ever taken, what should they watch for and what can they do now.

Public detail is limited. The number of people who might be affected is unknown, and the listing does not name specific data types. What follows separates the group’s claim from established background on the actor and the sector, so readers can judge risk without treating an unverified leak-site post as settled fact.

What the listing says

The Gentlemen has listed PuroClean on its leak site. The reported summary associated with that listing points to puroclean.com and purocleanfranchise.com and describes PuroClean as North America’s largest privately owned property damage restoration franchise, using the brand phrase “The Paramedics of Property Damage®,” with more than 500 franchise locations across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico, headquartered in Tamarac, Florida. It notes 24/7 emergency services such as water damage mitigation, fire and smoke restoration, mold remediation, biohazard cleanup, and reconstruction, a stated response goal within two hours, preferred-provider relationships with three of the top five U.S. insurance carriers, and a brand launch in 2001 under the legal entity PuroSystems.

The listing does not disclose how any alleged intrusion occurred, when it supposedly happened, whether encryption or exfiltration was involved, or how many individuals might be implicated. People affected are reported as unknown. Data types named as exposed are not disclosed. Those gaps mean the post functions as an accusation and a pressure tactic typical of extortion sites, not as a verified inventory of stolen records. The company has not publicly confirmed the claim as of writing.

The group behind it: The Gentlemen

The Gentlemen is known in public reporting as a ransomware and extortion operator that publishes victim names on a leak site to increase pressure for payment. Like other groups in this category, it typically claims to have stolen data and threatens release if demands are unmet. Public accounts of such crews often describe double-extortion patterns—disrupting operations while also threatening publication—but those are general patterns of the ecosystem, not proven steps in this specific case.

For this listing, only what appears in the reported claim should be attributed to the group: that it has named PuroClean and framed the brand in the terms above. No method, ransom figure, file count, or sample set is provided in the facts available here. Readers should treat “The Gentlemen claims” and “according to the listing” as the accurate framing until a company statement, regulator notice, or other independent confirmation exists.

Who is PuroClean?

PuroClean operates in property damage restoration: emergency response after water, fire, smoke, mold, and biohazard events, plus related reconstruction. Franchise networks of this kind coordinate local crews, dispatch, billing, and often work closely with homeowners, commercial property managers, and insurance carriers. The brand’s scale—hundreds of locations in the U.S., Canada, and Puerto Rico—and its role as a preferred provider for major insurers mean it sits at a junction where property addresses, contact details, claim references, and service histories commonly flow in the ordinary course of business.

A leak-site listing aimed at such a firm matters because restoration work is time-sensitive and trust-heavy. People call these services in stressful moments; insurers rely on them for mitigation documentation. Whether or not any data left PuroClean’s environment remains unconfirmed. The consequence of the listing itself is reputational and practical: customers and partners may wonder whether their information could appear in criminal channels, even while the underlying claim stays unverified.

What data was at risk

The facts state that data types named as exposed are not disclosed. It is therefore not established that any particular category of record was taken. If files were taken from an organization in this sector, firms typically hold information needed to schedule jobs, document damage, bill insurers, and support franchises—for example contact names, phone numbers, emails, property addresses, claim or policy references, photos or reports of damage, payment or invoice details, and internal franchise or employee records. That is sector context, not a statement of what, if anything, left PuroClean.

Because the listing offers no inventory, any discussion of exposure must stay conditional. Exact contents are unconfirmed. No headcount of affected people is known. Readers should not assume their own file is in a dump solely because a brand they used appears on an extortion site.

The real-world impact

If personal or claim-related data were ever obtained by criminals, real-world risks would include targeted phishing that references a recent water or fire job, attempts to redirect insurance reimbursements, identity fraud using names and addresses, or pressure on franchisees and staff. Property restoration customers are often dealing with displacement or loss; social-engineering attempts that sound like follow-up from a contractor or insurer can be especially convincing. Organizations in the same position face operational distraction, partner questions, and the cost of investigating an unverified claim.

None of that proves a breach occurred here. A leak-site listing establishes that a named group chose to publicize a victim name and marketing-style description. It does not by itself prove theft, the sensitivity of any files, or timelines. Impact on any individual remains hypothetical until there is clearer evidence—company notice, regulator filing, or reliable appearance of specific records in known breach corpora.

Steps worth taking either way

Even when a listing is unconfirmed, ordinary precautions reduce harm if something later surfaces. Consider the following:

These steps are prudent whether or not The Gentlemen’s listing is accurate. Public detail on this incident remains limited; the company has not publicly confirmed it as of writing. Staying alert to conditional risk—without treating an extortion-site accusation as proven fact—is the balanced approach for people who may have interacted with PuroClean’s network.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

SourceLeak-site claim data adapted from RansomLook.io, used under CC BY 4.0.

CompanyPuroClean security record
84/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B- 76Above-average record

1 reported incident on record.

See PuroClean’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Magnetos y Refacciones Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware GroupSeptember 21, 2026Craisa Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware GroupSeptember 21, 2026Crystal Glass Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware GroupSeptember 21, 2026Progeny Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware GroupSeptember 21, 2026

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the PuroClean Listed by The Gentlemen Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by thegentlemen — unverified claim, pending independent verification. Leak-site claim data adapted from RansomLook.io, used under CC BY 4.0.

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram