Presentations.AI Listed by Unsafe Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do
SourceLeak-site claim data adapted from RansomLook.io, used under CC BY 4.0.
Presentations.AI was listed on August 10, 2026 by the Unsafe ransomware group, which claimed to have exposed personal data of an undisclosed number of people. Individuals are advised to check whether their information may be involved and take appropriate protective steps.
A ransomware group calling itself Unsafe has listed Presentations.AI on its leak site, raising practical questions for anyone who has used the service or shared information through it. As of writing, Presentations.AI has not publicly confirmed the incident, and independent verification is not available in the material at hand. What is known is limited to the group’s own listing and a handful of accompanying details; everything else remains unconfirmed.
For customers, collaborators, and others whose details may sit in such a platform’s systems, the immediate concern is not drama but clarity: what has actually been claimed, what has not been shown, and what sensible steps people can take while the picture stays incomplete.
What the listing says
According to the listing, Unsafe posted Presentations.AI on its leak site on August 10, 2026, with a timestamp of 2:44:12 PM. The entry includes figures presented as revenue of $5 million and a view count of 492, along with a status timer showing 9d 16h 15m 42s at the time captured in the record. The number of people affected is unknown. The types of data supposedly involved are not disclosed in the listing material provided.
No method of intrusion, no timeline of alleged access, and no inventory of files are described in the available facts. The listing is an accusation published by the group for its own purposes. Presentations.AI has not publicly confirmed the incident as of writing, and nothing in the record establishes that data left the company’s control or that any particular category of information was taken.
Who is Unsafe?
Unsafe is known publicly as a ransomware and extortion-style actor that, like other groups in this category, pressures organisations by threatening to publish material it claims to hold. Such groups typically operate leak sites where they name alleged victims, post countdowns or status timers, and use the threat of disclosure to seek payment. Their postings are marketing and leverage, not audited reports.
Well-documented patterns among similar crews include double-extortion tactics—encrypting systems where they can and threatening to leak data—and the recycling or exaggeration of claims when it suits them. None of that proves what happened in any single case. For this listing, the only specific claim tied to Presentations.AI is that the group has named the company on its site; the group’s broader reputation does not fill in missing details about scale, contents, or confirmation.
About Presentations.AI
Presentations.AI is a business that offers AI-assisted presentation tools. Organisations in this sector commonly help users create, store, and share slide decks and related work product, often under individual or team accounts. Services of this kind typically sit at the intersection of personal productivity and workplace collaboration, which means they may hold account credentials, profile information, uploaded content, and business-related documents depending on how customers use them.
A leak-site listing naming such a provider matters because presentation platforms can concentrate work that is sensitive in context—internal plans, client-facing material, or personal details tied to accounts—even when the exact scope of any alleged incident is unknown. The consequence of a listing is therefore attention and uncertainty for users and partners, not a verified inventory of loss.
The information in question
The listing does not name exposed data types. Public detail on what, if anything, was taken is limited. It is not established that specific categories of information left Presentations.AI’s systems.
If files or records were obtained from a service in this sector, firms of this kind typically hold account identifiers, contact details, authentication-related data, and user-generated content such as presentation files and associated metadata. Some customers may also store commercially sensitive drafts or shared workspace material. Those are sector norms, not a confirmed description of this case. Any discussion of risk has to stay conditional: the listing’s silence on data types means readers should not treat a particular dataset as proven to be in circulation.
What's at stake
For individuals, the practical stakes—if the group’s claims were accurate and if personal or account-related information were involved—could include unwanted contact, password reuse attacks, or social engineering that references workplace projects. For organisations that use the platform, stakes could include exposure of internal drafts, client names in shared decks, or operational details that competitors or scammers might misuse. None of that is confirmed here; it is the ordinary risk profile people weigh when a familiar SaaS name appears on an extortion site.
For the company named in the listing, the stakes include reputational pressure, customer questions, and the operational burden of investigating an unverified public claim. A leak-site entry does not by itself establish negligence, successful theft, or the quality of any organisation’s defences. It establishes that a group chose to publish a name and a set of marketing-style fields. Readers should separate that fact from assumptions about outcomes.
Steps worth taking either way
Treat the situation as a prompt for hygiene rather than proof that your data is already public. If you use Presentations.AI, consider changing your password on the service and anywhere you reused the same one, and turn on multi-factor authentication where it is offered. Be cautious of unexpected messages that reference presentations, invoices, or “urgent security reviews,” which often ride on news of leak-site listings. If you share workspaces with colleagues or clients, agree how you will verify unusual requests offline.
Monitor financial and email accounts for odd activity in the ordinary way, and keep an eye on official statements from the company rather than solely on criminal leak sites. If you want a concrete next check, you can run a free exposure scan of your email to see whether your address has already appeared in known breach datasets unrelated to this claim. Those steps remain useful whether or not Unsafe’s listing is ever substantiated.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
Deck App Technologies Pte. Ltd Listed by Unsafe Ransomware GroupPhiladelphia Insurance Companies Listed by Ethics Ransomware GroupHolstrom Listed by Ethics Ransomware GroupElixi International SA Listed by Space Bears Ransomware GroupLatest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Presentations.AI Listed by Unsafe Ransomware Group →
Publicly posted by unsafe — unverified claim, pending independent verification. Leak-site claim data adapted from RansomLook.io, used under CC BY 4.0.
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.