LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › Pemiblanc Data Breach (2018)

CRITICAL severityConfirmedHow we verify

Pemiblanc Data Breach (2018): What Was Exposed & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·April 2, 2018

SourceBreach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Pemiblanc Data Breach (2018)

Reported April 2, 2018. Approximately 111.0M people affected.

CRITICAL
Severity
111.0M
People affected
2
Data types exposed
April 2, 2018
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The Pemiblanc Data Breach (2018) (reported April 2, 2018) exposed Email addresses and Passwords belonging to roughly 111.0M people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
CRITICAL severityConfirmed
Account credentials exposed.
Corroborated by an official disclosure or a verified breach feed.
Was your email in the Pemiblanc Data Breach (2018) breach?
111.0M accounts were exposed here. See if yours is one — and every other breach it’s in. 15-sec check, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

In April 2018, a credential-stuffing list known as Pemiblanc was discovered on a server in France. The list contained 111 million email addresses and passwords that had been collected from prior incidents and compiled for use in account takeover attempts against other online services. The discovery was reported on 2 April 2018. Public information about the incident remains limited to the existence and contents of the list itself.

What happened

The Pemiblanc list was found on a French server in April 2018. It held 111 million email-and-password pairs assembled from multiple earlier data breaches. The material was structured for credential-stuffing attacks rather than being the direct result of a single new intrusion into one system.

No further technical details, such as the precise method of compilation or the identity of the server operator, have been disclosed in public reporting.

How a breach like this happens

Credential-stuffing lists are typically built by aggregating usernames and passwords that have already appeared in unrelated breaches. Attackers then test those combinations against other services where users may have reused the same credentials.

The process requires no new compromise of the target organisation; it relies instead on the reuse of previously exposed authentication data across different platforms.

About Pemiblanc

Pemiblanc refers to the name given to the compiled list rather than to a single operating organisation. Such datasets are assembled from records that originally belonged to many separate services and are then used to probe accounts elsewhere.

Because the list draws on credentials from varied sources, its discovery highlights the downstream effects that follow when authentication data from any one service circulates beyond its original context.

The information in question

The list is reported to contain only two categories of data.

Exact details on password formats, whether any were hashed, or additional fields have not been confirmed publicly.

The real-world impact

Individuals whose credentials appear on the list face an elevated risk that the same combinations will be tested against other accounts they hold. Services that do not enforce unique passwords or multi-factor authentication are most exposed to this form of automated attack.

For any organisation whose earlier breach contributed records to the list, the incident underscores the long-term consequences of credential exposure even after the original event has been addressed.

If your data was in this breach

Change passwords on any accounts that reuse the exposed credentials, and enable multi-factor authentication wherever it is available. Review login activity on important services for signs of unauthorised access.

Readers can run a free exposure scan of their email address against known breach data to determine whether their information appears in this or other documented incidents.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Method

CompanyPemiblanc security record
70/100
DoxxScan™ · Moderate doxx risk
C- 64Below-average record

1 reported incident on record.

See Pemiblanc’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

IIMJobs Data Breach (2018)December 31, 2018BannerBit Data Breach (2018)December 29, 2018BlankMediaGames Data Breach (2018)December 28, 2018OGUsers (2019 breach) Data Breach (2018)December 26, 2018

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Pemiblanc Data Breach (2018) →

Verified breach. Breach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram