Nottingham Construction Listed by medusa Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do
Nottingham Construction was listed by the Medusa ransomware group on May 13, 2025, following the exfiltration of internal files. Individuals who may have had information held by the company should check for any contact or instructions from the organisation and take appropriate protective steps.
When a company that works on commercial building projects appears on a ransomware group's leak site, the people most directly concerned are often employees, contractors, and business partners whose details may sit inside internal files. Public reporting on 13 May 2025 states that Nottingham Construction has been listed by the group known as medusa, with a claimed volume of 252.50 GB of internal data said to have been taken. The number of individuals affected remains unknown, and the precise contents of the files have not been independently confirmed.
For anyone who has worked with or for the firm, the practical question is whether personal or business information has left the organisation's control and what that could mean for identity, privacy, or ongoing contracts. The available record is limited; what follows sets out only what has been reported and the established context around the actors and the sector.
Breaking down the breach
According to the public listing associated with the medusa ransomware group, Nottingham Construction was named as a victim on or around 13 May 2025. The group claims that internal files were exfiltrated during a ransomware attack and that the total volume of data involved is 252.50 GB. No independent confirmation of the intrusion method, the exact date of the attack, or the full scope of systems affected has been published in the material provided. The number of people whose information may be included is listed as unknown.
Ransomware incidents of this type typically involve both encryption of systems and the theft of data for leverage. In this case the public claim centres on the exfiltration of internal files rather than on any disclosed ransom demand or payment outcome. Timing beyond the report date, technical indicators of compromise, and any subsequent recovery steps by the company remain undisclosed in the available facts.
Who is medusa?
Medusa is a ransomware operation that has been active in recent years and is known for a double-extortion model: encrypting victim systems while also copying data and threatening to publish it if a ransom is not paid. The group maintains a public leak site on which it lists organisations it claims to have compromised, often posting sample files or full archives when negotiations fail or deadlines pass. Like other ransomware groups of this kind, it has targeted a range of sectors, including construction, manufacturing, and professional services, and typically seeks large volumes of internal documents that can pressure a victim into payment.
Claims made on such leak sites are assertions by the attackers themselves. They are not independent verification that every listed file is authentic or that every named organisation was successfully breached in the manner described. In the present case, the listing of Nottingham Construction and the stated data volume of 252.50 GB should be treated as claims by the group unless and until corroborated by the organisation or by forensic reporting.
Who is Nottingham Construction?
Nottingham Construction is a general contractor based in Warminster, Pennsylvania. Public background supplied with the breach report states that the firm was established in 1989 and incorporated in 1998. It began in commercial carpentry and later expanded into general contracting, serving national retail companies across a geographic range from New York to Virginia. Its corporate office is listed at 375 Ivyland Road, Unit 10, Warminster, PA 18974, and the company is reported to have 21 employees.
Organisations of this size and type routinely handle project documentation, subcontractor agreements, employee records, client correspondence, and financial materials related to construction work. A breach involving internal files therefore carries consequences both for the firm's day-to-day operations and for the individuals and partner companies whose information may appear in those files. Because the firm works with national retail clients, any exposure of project or commercial data can also affect relationships beyond its immediate workforce.
The information in question
The facts state that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack and that the claimed volume is 252.50 GB. No further breakdown of file types—such as employee personal data, payroll records, client contracts, or architectural drawings—has been disclosed in the available reporting. The exact contents therefore remain unconfirmed.
Companies in commercial construction and general contracting typically hold personnel files, tax and payroll information, insurance documents, subcontractor details, project schedules, and correspondence with retail clients. Any or all of these categories could fall under the broad description of “internal files,” but it would be inaccurate to assert that specific categories were present without confirmation. Readers should treat the data types as unknown beyond the general claim of internal files.
The real-world impact
For individuals, the primary risks associated with an unconfirmed but claimed exfiltration of internal files include potential exposure of contact details, employment information, or financial identifiers if such material was among the taken data. That exposure can lead to phishing attempts that reference real project or workplace details, or to longer-term identity-related misuse if sensitive personal fields were included. Because the number of affected people is unknown, it is not possible to quantify how many individuals face these risks.
For the organisation, the consequences can include operational disruption from encrypted systems, costs of investigation and recovery, possible contractual or regulatory notifications, and reputational pressure from clients who learn that project-related material may have left the company's control. A claimed volume of 252.50 GB is substantial for a firm of 21 employees, suggesting that a wide range of business records could be involved, yet the absence of a confirmed inventory means the precise business impact cannot yet be measured from public sources alone.
Were you affected?
If you are a current or former employee, contractor, or business partner of Nottingham Construction, monitor financial and email accounts for unexpected activity and treat unsolicited messages that reference the company or its projects with caution. Consider placing fraud alerts with credit bureaus if you believe sensitive personal data may have been involved, and retain any official notices the company may later issue. Because the full list of affected individuals has not been published, you can also run a free exposure scan of your email address against known breach data sets to see whether your information has already appeared in other documented incidents. Stay alert to further statements from the organisation itself, as those remain the most reliable source of confirmation about what was taken and who is affected.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
Bridgebank Limited Listed by medusa Ransomware GroupJ McCann & Co Ltd Listed by medusa Ransomware GroupMiles Industries Listed by medusa Ransomware GroupFDC Interiors Listed by medusa Ransomware GroupLatest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Nottingham Construction Listed by medusa Ransomware Group →
Publicly posted by medusa — unverified claim, pending independent verification
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.