LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › Kimsufi Data Breach (2015)

HIGH severityConfirmedHow we verify

Kimsufi Data Breach (2015): What Was Exposed & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·May 1, 2015

SourceBreach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Kimsufi Data Breach (2015)

Reported May 1, 2015. Approximately 505K people affected.

HIGH
Severity
505K
People affected
4
Data types exposed
May 1, 2015
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

The Kimsufi Data Breach (2015) (reported May 1, 2015) exposed Email addresses, IP addresses, Passwords and Usernames belonging to roughly 505K people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityConfirmed
Account credentials exposed.
Corroborated by an official disclosure or a verified breach feed.
Was your email in the Kimsufi Data Breach (2015) breach?
505K accounts were exposed here. See if yours is one — and every other breach it’s in. 15-sec check, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Kimsufi, a provider of dedicated servers, experienced a data breach that affected its customer forum. The incident was reported on May 1, 2015, and involved 505,000 accounts. The exposed records included usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and passwords stored as salted MD5 hashes. Public information remains limited to these details, with no confirmed timeline of access or method of compromise disclosed.

Breaking down the breach

The breach occurred on the vBulletin forum operated by Kimsufi. It contained more than half a million user accounts. The data types listed in reports are usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and passwords hashed with salting using the MD5 algorithm. No further technical details about the intrusion, such as the date of access or the volume of data taken, have been made public.

How a breach like this happens

Forum platforms that run older software versions are frequently targeted because they host large numbers of user accounts in a single location. Attackers often exploit unpatched vulnerabilities in the forum software or gain access through compromised administrator credentials. Once inside, they can extract the entire user table, which commonly stores login names, contact details, and password hashes. Salted MD5 hashes slow down automated cracking attempts but remain susceptible to modern hardware when the original passwords are weak or reused.

Who is Kimsufi?

Kimsufi supplies low-cost dedicated servers to individuals and small organisations. Its forum served as the main channel for customer support and community discussion. A breach at a hosting provider is consequential because the affected accounts can reveal both personal contact information and technical identifiers such as IP addresses that link users to specific server rentals.

The information in question

The breach record identifies four categories of data. The exact contents of each account remain unconfirmed beyond the categories listed in public reports.

Why it matters

Email addresses and usernames can be used for targeted phishing or account takeover attempts on other services where the same credentials are reused. IP addresses may allow correlation with other online activity. Password hashes, even when salted, can be processed offline; users who chose simple or repeated passwords face a higher risk of their credentials being recovered. For the organisation, the incident highlights the exposure of customer support channels that hold both personal and infrastructure-related data.

If your data was in this breach

Change the password on the Kimsufi forum account and on any other site where the same password or a close variation was used. Enable two-factor authentication wherever available. Review recent account activity for signs of unauthorised access. Readers can run a free exposure scan of their email address against known breach data to check for additional appearances.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Method

CompanyKimsufi security record
73/100
DoxxScan™ · Moderate doxx risk
B- 78Above-average record

1 reported incident on record.

See Kimsufi’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Trillian Data Breach (2015)December 27, 2015QuinStreet Data Breach (2015)December 14, 2015Aternos Data Breach (2015)December 6, 2015The Fappening Data Breach (2015)December 1, 2015

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Kimsufi Data Breach (2015) →

Verified breach. Breach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram