doublehorse.in Listed by lockbit3 Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

People who have shopped with, worked for, or supplied Double Horse may now face uncertainty about whether their personal or business details sit among files claimed to have been taken in a ransomware incident. When a company that moves everyday food products is listed by a ransomware group, the practical concern is straightforward: internal records can contain contact details, order histories, employee information, or commercial documents that outsiders can misuse for fraud, phishing, or competitive harm. Public detail remains limited, so the scale of any exposure is not yet clear, but the listing alone is enough reason for customers and staff to stay alert.

On 24 April 2024, the organisation doublehorse.in was reported as listed by the LockBit3 ransomware group. The group claims that internal files were exfiltrated during a ransomware attack. No confirmed figure for the number of people affected has been published, and the precise contents of the files have not been independently verified in the available record.

What happened

According to the public report dated 24 April 2024, doublehorse.in appears on the leak site associated with LockBit3. The listing asserts that internal files were taken in a ransomware attack. No further technical detail—such as the exact date of intrusion, the initial access method, the volume of data, or whether systems were also encrypted—has been disclosed in the material available. The number of individuals whose information may be involved is listed as unknown. Because the only source for the claim is the threat actor’s own listing, the incident should be treated as an unverified assertion until the organisation or independent investigators confirm or refute it.

Who is lockbit3?

LockBit3 is the name used by a well-documented ransomware operation that has been active for several years. The group typically follows a double-extortion model: after gaining access to a network, operators encrypt systems and simultaneously copy data, then threaten to publish the stolen material on a dedicated leak site if a ransom is not paid. LockBit affiliates have targeted organisations across many sectors and countries; their public leak site has been used repeatedly to pressure victims by posting sample files or full archives. The group’s infrastructure and branding have evolved over time, but the core tactic—exfiltration plus encryption plus public listing—remains consistent. In the present case, the appearance of doublehorse.in on that site is simply a claim by the group; it does not by itself prove the depth or success of any intrusion.

doublehorse.in and its sector

Double Horse is a brand that sells fast-moving consumer goods, including premium rice, instant mixes, health items, culinary pastes, and ready-to-cook or ready-to-eat products. Companies in this sector maintain supply-chain records, wholesale and retail customer lists, employee payroll and HR files, quality-control documentation, and marketing databases. Because food products move through distributors, retailers and end consumers, the organisation necessarily holds a mixture of commercial and personal data. A ransomware claim against such a firm is consequential precisely because those records can link names, addresses, purchase patterns and internal processes. Even when the exact data set remains unconfirmed, the sector’s ordinary holdings make the potential impact broader than a purely technical outage.

The information in question

The available facts state only that “internal files” were exfiltrated. No inventory of specific data types—such as customer names, email addresses, payment details, employee records or supplier contracts—has been published. Organisations of this kind typically store order histories, contact databases, inventory systems and personnel files, any of which could appear among internal documents. Until the company or forensic investigators release a verified description, the precise contents remain unconfirmed. Readers should therefore treat any circulating samples or claims with caution and wait for authoritative clarification.

What's at stake

For individuals, the main risks are secondary fraud and social-engineering attacks. If contact details or purchase records were among the files, criminals could craft convincing phishing messages that reference real orders or account information. Employees face similar exposure if payroll or identity documents were included. For the organisation itself, the stakes include operational disruption, potential regulatory scrutiny under data-protection rules, and reputational damage among retailers and consumers who rely on the brand for everyday goods. Because the number of people affected is unknown and the data types are only broadly described, the full extent of these risks cannot yet be quantified; the prudent assumption is that any sensitive internal material could be misused until proven otherwise.

What to do if you're exposed

If you have an account, order history or employment relationship with Double Horse, treat unsolicited emails, calls or messages that reference the company with extra care. Change passwords on any related accounts, enable multi-factor authentication where available, and monitor bank or credit statements for unexpected activity. Consider placing a fraud alert with credit-reporting services if you believe identity documents may have been involved. Keep records of any suspicious contact. As a practical next step, you can run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach data sets; that check will not confirm or deny involvement in this specific incident, but it can surface other exposures that require attention. Stay informed through official statements from the company rather than unverified social-media claims.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.