Disaronno International Listed by meow Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

Ransomware groups continue to pressure organisations across consumer goods and manufacturing by claiming data theft and advertising access for sale, often with limited public verification. Against that backdrop, Disaronno International was listed by the meow ransomware group on 12 February 2024. The listing characterises the incident as a ransomware attack involving exfiltration of internal files and marks the entry as SALE. The number of people affected is unknown, and further operational detail has not been released. For employees, partners and customers of a well-known spirits brand, even an unverified claim raises practical questions about what may have left the organisation’s systems and how that information could be misused.

Public reporting on the matter rests solely on the group’s leak-site claim. No independent confirmation of the intrusion method, timeline or full scope has been published, so the available picture remains incomplete. What follows examines only the stated facts, places the actor in its known pattern of activity, and outlines the ordinary risks that arise when internal corporate files are said to have been taken.

Inside the incident

According to the reported listing, Disaronno International was named by meow on 12 February 2024. The entry describes the event as a ransomware attack in which internal files were allegedly exfiltrated, and it is tagged SALE. No figure for the volume of data, no list of specific file categories beyond the general label “internal files,” and no count of affected individuals have been disclosed. The method of initial access, the duration of any presence inside the network, and whether encryption was also deployed remain undisclosed. Public detail is therefore limited to the group’s claim that data left the organisation and is being offered for sale.

Because the listing itself is the primary source, the incident should be treated as an unverified claim until the organisation or independent investigators provide further confirmation. No dollar amounts, ransom demands or technical indicators have been published in connection with this particular entry.

The group behind it: meow

Meow is a ransomware actor that has operated by listing victim organisations on dedicated leak sites and advertising stolen data, frequently under a SALE designation. Public reporting on the group’s broader activity shows a pattern of opportunistic targeting across multiple sectors, followed by claims of data exfiltration and attempts to monetise the material through sale or, in some cases, public release. The group’s typical tactics, as documented in open sources, include pressure via leak-site postings rather than prolonged negotiation pages, and the use of short, transactional language such as SALE to signal availability of the data.

In this instance the group claims to have obtained internal files from Disaronno International and to be offering them for sale. No additional statements, sample files or proof packages specific to this victim have been described in the available record. As with other meow listings, the claim stands as an assertion by the actor until corroborated.

Disaronno International and its sector

Disaronno International is the company behind the well-known Disaronno amaretto brand and related spirits products. Organisations of this type operate in the alcoholic-beverage sector, managing production, distribution, marketing and retail relationships across multiple markets. They routinely hold employee records, supplier and distributor contracts, financial and logistics data, marketing materials, and customer or trade-partner contact information. Some also maintain consumer-facing loyalty or promotional databases.

A breach claim against such a firm is consequential because the same internal files that support day-to-day operations can contain personal data of staff and business contacts, commercial terms that competitors or fraudsters might exploit, and operational details that could aid further social-engineering attempts. Even when the precise contents remain unconfirmed, the mere assertion that internal material has been taken creates uncertainty for anyone whose information may have been stored in those systems.

What was likely exposed

The facts state only that internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. No further breakdown of data types—such as employee records, customer lists, financial documents or intellectual property—has been provided, and the number of people affected is unknown. Organisations in the spirits and consumer-goods sector typically store human-resources files, payroll and benefits data, vendor contracts, shipping and inventory records, and marketing or sales databases. Any of these categories could fall under the broad heading of “internal files,” yet the exact contents remain unconfirmed.

Readers should therefore treat specific assumptions about what was taken as speculative. The only confirmed description available is the group’s claim of internal-file exfiltration offered for sale.

What's at stake

If internal files did leave the organisation, the practical risks include identity fraud or phishing directed at employees whose personal details appear in HR or payroll documents, and business-email compromise attempts that leverage supplier or distributor contact lists. Commercial information, if present, could be used by competitors or for targeted fraud against trading partners. For the company itself, the claim can generate reputational pressure, potential regulatory scrutiny under data-protection rules, and the operational cost of investigating and containing the incident.

Because the scale and precise contents are undisclosed, the actual harm cannot yet be quantified. The core concern for individuals is that any personal data contained in those files could later surface in criminal markets or be used in social-engineering campaigns that appear legitimate because they reference real internal details.

What to do if you're exposed

Anyone who has worked for, supplied or done business with Disaronno International should treat the claim as a prompt for ordinary hygiene rather than panic. Monitor bank and credit accounts for unusual activity, enable multi-factor authentication on email and financial services, and be sceptical of unexpected messages that reference company matters or request credentials or payments. If you receive notification from the organisation itself, follow its official guidance on credit monitoring or password resets. As a further check, you can run a free exposure scan of your email address to see whether it has already appeared in known breach data sets. Remaining alert to phishing that exploits any newly public details is the most immediate practical step while fuller information about this incident remains limited.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.