LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › codesco.com Listed by safepay Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

codesco.com Listed by safepay Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·January 20, 2025
codesco.com Listed by safepay Ransomware Group

Reported January 20, 2025.

HIGH
Severity
January 20, 2025
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

codesco.com has been listed by the safepay ransomware group, with internal files reported as exfiltrated; the incident came to light on January 20, 2025. Individuals who have interacted with the site should check for any personal notifications and consider changing passwords or monitoring their accounts.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Ransomware groups continue to target technology and software firms as part of a broader pattern of double-extortion attacks that pair system encryption with data theft. In this environment, even mid-sized specialist providers can appear on leak sites, creating uncertainty for clients, partners and staff whose information may have been held by the victim organisation.

On 20 January 2025, codesco.com was listed by the safepay ransomware group. Public detail remains limited: the number of people affected is unknown, and the only confirmed description of the material involved is that internal files were allegedly exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. The listing itself is a claim by the group and has not been independently verified in the available record.

Breaking down the breach

According to the reported information, codesco.com appeared on the safepay leak site on 20 January 2025. The incident is characterised as a ransomware attack in which internal files were allegedly exfiltrated. No further operational details—such as the initial access vector, the duration of the intrusion, the volume of data taken, or any ransom demand—have been disclosed in the public summary. The number of individuals potentially affected is listed as unknown. Because the primary source is the group’s own listing, the claim that codesco.com was compromised should be treated as unverified until corroborated by the organisation or independent investigators.

Ransomware incidents of this type typically involve both encryption of systems and the theft of data for leverage. In the absence of additional statements from codesco.com or law-enforcement confirmations, it is not possible to state whether systems were restored, whether a ransom was paid, or whether the stolen files have been released. The available facts stop at the listing date, the attribution to safepay, and the description of exfiltrated internal files.

Who is safepay?

Safepay is a ransomware operation that has been active in the public threat landscape since approximately mid-2024. Like many contemporary groups, it follows a double-extortion model: encrypting victim systems while simultaneously stealing data and threatening to publish it on a dedicated leak site if payment is not made. The group has listed organisations across multiple sectors, often providing sample files or file-tree screenshots to demonstrate access. Its communications are typically concise, and it has not been publicly linked to a single nation-state or long-standing criminal brand with decades of history; rather, it is treated by researchers as a relatively recent entrant that reuses common ransomware toolkits and affiliate-style recruitment.

In the present case, safepay’s listing of codesco.com constitutes a claim of successful intrusion and data theft. No specific statements by the group about the content of the codesco.com files, any ransom amount, or negotiation status appear in the provided record. Therefore any assertion that the group “stole X” or “demanded Y” would go beyond the facts and is not made here.

Who is codesco.com?

Codesco.com is described as a technology company that specialises in building software solutions. Its services include software development, software testing, application management and consultancy. The firm works across multiple industries with an emphasis on improving productivity, efficiency and accuracy for its clients. Organisations of this type routinely hold source code, project documentation, client contracts, internal communications, employee records and credentials used to access development and production environments.

A breach at a software-services provider is consequential because the firm often sits at the intersection of multiple client environments. Even if the stolen material is limited to internal files, those files can contain intellectual property, configuration details, or personal data of staff and customers. The reputational and contractual implications for a company whose business is the secure delivery of technology services are therefore material, regardless of the precise scale of the incident.

What was likely exposed

The only data type named in the available facts is “internal files exfiltrated in ransomware attack.” No inventory of file names, databases, or categories such as customer lists, financial records or authentication credentials has been published. Exact contents therefore remain unconfirmed.

Organisations that develop and manage software typically store source-code repositories, design documents, test data, client correspondence, employee personal information, and system credentials. Any or all of these could fall under the broad heading of “internal files.” Until codesco.com or an independent forensic report provides a verified list, it is not possible to state with certainty which categories were taken. Readers should treat claims of specific data types beyond the stated “internal files” as unverified.

The real-world impact

For individuals whose information may have been held by codesco.com—employees, contractors or clients—the primary risks are identity-related misuse and targeted social engineering. Internal files can contain names, email addresses, phone numbers, project roles or even partial credentials. Criminals who obtain such material often use it months later for phishing campaigns that appear legitimate because they reference real projects or colleagues. Financial fraud and account takeover remain possible if login details or recovery information were present.

For the organisation itself, the consequences include potential disruption of development pipelines, loss of proprietary code or client data, contractual notification obligations, and the cost of forensic investigation and remediation. Because the number of people affected is unknown and the precise contents unconfirmed, the full scope of downstream harm cannot yet be quantified. The listing alone, however, creates a period of uncertainty during which both the company and any exposed individuals must assume that sensitive material may be in unauthorised hands.

If your data was in this claimed breach

If you have a past or present relationship with codesco.com—as an employee, contractor or client—treat the possibility of exposure seriously even while details remain limited. Change passwords for any accounts that may have been shared with or managed by the company, enable multi-factor authentication wherever available, and monitor financial and email accounts for unusual activity. Be especially wary of unsolicited messages that reference software projects, invoices or internal systems; verify such contacts through known channels before responding.

You can also run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether it has already appeared in known breach datasets. Doing so provides an early indication of whether your credentials or personal details have circulated more widely, allowing you to prioritise further protective steps.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companycodesco.com security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See codesco.com’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

dfcsystems.de Listed by safepay Ransomware GroupDecember 19, 2025fest-group.de Listed by safepay Ransomware GroupDecember 14, 2025mmc.de Listed by safepay Ransomware GroupNovember 18, 2025xortec.de Listed by safepay Ransomware GroupOctober 24, 2025

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the codesco.com Listed by safepay Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by safepay — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram