LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › Clnica CES Listed by qilin Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

Clnica CES Listed by qilin Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·December 23, 2024
Clnica CES Listed by qilin Ransomware Group

Reported December 23, 2024.

HIGH
Severity
December 23, 2024
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

Clnica CES was listed by the qilin ransomware group on December 23, 2024, after internal files were exfiltrated in a ransomware attack. Individuals connected to the clinic should review their personal data for signs of exposure and take protective steps if needed.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

On 23 December 2024, the ransomware group known as qilin listed Clínica CES on its leak site and claimed that internal files taken from the organisation would be made available for download on 20 January 2025. Public detail on the incident remains limited: the number of people affected is unknown, and the precise contents of the files have not been independently confirmed. For patients, staff and partners whose information may sit inside those files, the practical stakes are immediate—medical and administrative records can be used for fraud, identity misuse or further targeting long after the initial notice appears.

Because the listing itself is a claim by the group rather than a verified disclosure from Clínica CES, anyone connected to the clinic should treat the situation as a potential exposure until clearer official information emerges. The following account stays strictly within what has been reported and what is publicly known about the actor and the sector.

Breaking down the breach

According to the available record, Clínica CES was listed by the qilin ransomware group on 23 December 2024. The group stated that internal files had been exfiltrated in a ransomware attack and that “all data of this company will be available for download on 20.01.2025.” The listing also reproduced promotional text associated with the clinic: “¡Bienvenido a la Clínica CES! Somos un gran equipo con alta calidad humana, ética y científica. Nuestro personal se encuentra al servicio del bienestar integral de los pac\ldots”

No further technical detail has been made public. The scale of the intrusion, the initial access method, the encryption status of systems, any ransom demand, and whether data were actually published on the stated date remain undisclosed. The number of individuals whose information may be involved is likewise unknown. In short, the only concrete elements on record are the listing date, the claim of exfiltrated internal files, and the announced publication date of 20 January 2025.

Inside qilin

Qilin is a ransomware operation that has been active for several years and is widely documented as operating on a ransomware-as-a-service model. Affiliates typically gain access to a target network, move laterally, exfiltrate data, and then deploy encryption while threatening to publish the stolen material if payment is not made—a classic double-extortion approach. The group maintains a dedicated leak site where it posts victim names, sample files and countdown timers for full data releases.

Public reporting has linked qilin to attacks across multiple sectors and regions; the group has been observed using common initial-access techniques such as compromised credentials, phishing and exploitation of unpatched remote-access services. Once inside, operators often spend time mapping the environment and identifying high-value data before encryption. These patterns are drawn from broader open-source analysis of the group’s activity and should not be read as confirmed specifics of the Clínica CES incident. In this case, the only assertion that can be attributed to qilin is the leak-site listing itself and the claim that internal files would be released on 20 January 2025.

Clínica CES and its sector

Clínica CES presents itself as a healthcare provider focused on comprehensive patient well-being, ethical practice and scientific quality. Organisations of this type routinely manage electronic health records, appointment systems, billing information, laboratory results, insurance data and staff personnel files. In many jurisdictions such entities are subject to strict data-protection and medical-confidentiality rules precisely because the information they hold is both sensitive and long-lived.

A ransomware incident at a clinic therefore carries consequences beyond ordinary corporate data loss. Disruption of clinical systems can delay care; exposure of patient records can enable medical identity theft or discrimination; and the mere appearance of a healthcare provider on a leak site can erode trust among patients and referring physicians. Because public detail about Clínica CES’s size, location and digital infrastructure is limited, the precise operational impact remains unconfirmed, yet the sector context alone makes the listing consequential.

What data was at risk

The only data type named in the available record is “internal files exfiltrated in a ransomware attack.” No inventory of patient records, employee data, financial documents or other categories has been published by either the clinic or independent investigators. The group’s statement that “all data of this company” would be released does not constitute verification of content.

Healthcare organisations typically hold names, dates of birth, contact details, medical histories, diagnostic images, insurance identifiers, payment information and internal administrative correspondence. Whether any or all of these categories were among the files allegedly taken from Clínica CES is unconfirmed. Readers should therefore treat the exposure as potential rather than proven until more precise disclosure appears.

What's at stake

For individuals, the principal risks are misuse of personal and medical information. Stolen health data can be sold for insurance fraud, used to open fraudulent accounts, or combined with other breaches to craft convincing phishing messages. Even limited administrative files can reveal enough to enable social-engineering attacks against patients or staff. Because medical records often remain relevant for years, the window of possible harm is longer than for many other data types.

For the organisation, the stakes include operational disruption, regulatory scrutiny, reputational damage and the cost of investigation and remediation. Patients may hesitate to share information or seek care if they believe confidentiality has been compromised. None of these outcomes has been independently verified in the present case; they represent the ordinary consequences observed when healthcare entities appear on ransomware leak sites.

If your data was in this claimed breach

If you have been a patient, employee or partner of Clínica CES, treat the listing as a prompt for caution rather than confirmed personal exposure. Monitor financial and insurance statements for unexpected activity, be alert to unsolicited requests for medical or identity information, and consider placing fraud alerts with credit bureaux where available. Change passwords on any accounts that may have reused credentials linked to the clinic, and enable multi-factor authentication wherever possible.

You can also run a free exposure scan of your email address to check whether your information has already surfaced in known breach data sets. Official statements from Clínica CES or relevant data-protection authorities, when they appear, should be the primary source for further guidance. Until then, the prudent course is measured vigilance based on the limited facts that have been reported.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

CompanyClnica CES security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See Clnica CES’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Cooperativa de Hospitales de Antioquia - COHAN Listed by qilin Ransomware GroupApril 20, 2026Andover Family Medicine Listed by qilin Ransomware GroupDecember 29, 2024Primary Plus Listed by qilin Ransomware GroupDecember 11, 2024Bianco Brain & Spine Listed by qilin Ransomware GroupDecember 11, 2024

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Clnica CES Listed by qilin Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by qilin — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram