LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › Clear Connection (clearconnection.com) Listed by fog Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

Clear Connection (clearconnection.com) Listed by fog Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·October 22, 2024
Clear Connection (clearconnection.com) Listed by fog Ransomware Group

Reported October 22, 2024.

HIGH
Severity
October 22, 2024
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

Clear Connection (clearconnection.com) has been listed by the fog ransomware group, with internal files confirmed to have been exfiltrated. The incident was disclosed on October 22, 2024; the number of individuals affected is not yet known, and those who may have had data with the organisation should review any notices issued and take appropriate protective steps.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Data types not itemised.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Ransomware groups continue to pressure organisations of every size by combining encryption with data theft and public leak-site listings. In this environment, even a single claim of exfiltration can leave customers, employees and partners uncertain about what information may now be circulating. On 22 October 2024 the group known as fog listed Clear Connection (clearconnection.com) among its claimed victims, asserting that it had taken 71 GB of internal files. The number of people affected remains unknown, and independent confirmation of the intrusion has not been published. The listing itself is therefore best treated as an unverified claim that still warrants careful attention from anyone connected to the organisation.

Because the volume of data cited is substantial and the files are described only as “internal,” the practical risk cannot yet be measured with precision. What is clear is that the incident sits squarely inside the current pattern of double-extortion ransomware activity, in which groups advertise stolen material to increase leverage. The following account stays strictly within the publicly reported facts and well-established background on the actor and the sector.

What happened

According to the leak-site listing dated 22 October 2024, fog claims to have conducted a ransomware attack against Clear Connection and to have exfiltrated 71 GB of internal files. No further technical details—such as the initial access vector, the duration of the intrusion, or whether systems were encrypted—have been disclosed in the available record. The number of individuals whose information may be contained in those files is listed as unknown. Public reporting has not confirmed that the organisation itself has acknowledged the incident or verified the volume and nature of the data. In short, the only concrete elements on record are the date of the listing, the claimed 71 GB of internal files, and the attribution to fog.

Who is fog?

Fog is a ransomware operation that became publicly visible in 2024. Like many contemporary groups, it follows a double-extortion model: after gaining access to a network it both encrypts systems and steals data, then threatens to publish the stolen material on a dedicated leak site if a ransom is not paid. Fog has listed victims across multiple sectors and geographies, typically posting sample files or volume claims to demonstrate possession of the data. Its public communications are limited to these leak-site notices; the group does not ordinarily issue detailed press statements or claim responsibility beyond the listings themselves. Because the Clear Connection entry appears on that same site, it should be understood as fog’s assertion rather than as independently verified fact. No additional statements by the group specifically about this victim have been reported.

About Clear Connection (clearconnection.com)

Clear Connection is the organisation associated with the domain clearconnection.com. Publicly available detail about its precise business lines, size and customer base is limited. Organisations operating under similar names and domains commonly provide connectivity, communications or related professional services and therefore maintain internal repositories of operational documents, employee records, client correspondence and technical configurations. A breach of such material can affect both the organisation’s day-to-day functioning and the privacy of anyone whose information appears in those files. The absence of richer public background does not reduce the potential consequences; it simply means that outsiders must rely on the limited facts that have been disclosed.

What data was at risk

The only data description supplied in the listing is “internal files” totalling 71 GB. No inventory of file types, no mention of personal identifiers, financial records or credentials, and no sample documents have been released in the public record. Organisations of this general character typically hold employee and contractor information, client contracts, network diagrams, billing data and internal communications. Whether any of those categories are present in the claimed 71 GB remains unconfirmed. Until a more detailed disclosure appears, the exact contents must be treated as unknown.

Why it matters

Even without a confirmed list of affected individuals, the claim of 71 GB of internal files carries concrete risks. If personal data is present, those individuals may face phishing, identity fraud or unsolicited contact that exploits knowledge of their relationship with Clear Connection. If operational or technical material is included, the organisation itself may confront competitive harm, regulatory scrutiny or disruption of services that depend on the confidentiality of those files. For third parties who exchange information with Clear Connection, the incident raises the ordinary questions of whether shared credentials or documents have been compromised and whether additional monitoring is warranted. Because the scale of personal impact is still listed as unknown, the prudent stance is to assume that exposure is possible rather than proven.

What to do if you're exposed

Anyone who has done business with, worked for, or otherwise shared information with Clear Connection should treat the listing as a prompt for basic hygiene rather than as proof of personal compromise. Review recent account activity for unexpected logins or password-reset requests, enable multi-factor authentication where it is not already in place, and remain alert for phishing messages that reference the organisation or the claimed breach. If you supplied financial or identity documents, consider placing a fraud alert with the major credit bureaus and monitoring statements for unusual activity. Finally, you can run a free exposure scan of your email address against known breach data sets; such a check will not confirm or deny involvement in this specific incident, but it will show whether your address has already appeared in other publicly documented leaks and can help prioritise further steps.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

CompanyClear Connection (clearconnection.com) security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See Clear Connection (clearconnection.com)’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

Aroma Housewares Co (Aromaco.com) Listed by fog Ransomware GroupDecember 25, 2024Forum Architecture & Interior Design (forumarchitecture.com) Listed by fog Ransomware GroupDecember 23, 2024Circle Electric (circleelectric.com) Listed by fog Ransomware GroupDecember 20, 2024Reliance Connects (relianceconnects.com) Listed by fog Ransomware GroupDecember 18, 2024

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Clear Connection (clearconnection.com) Listed by fog Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by fog — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram