LiveBreach Intelligence: data breaches, leaks & ransomware, tracked as they surfaceOngoing protection: GalaxyWarden →
Recent BreachesData breach tracker

Recent Breaches › calex##### Listed by clop Ransomware Group

HIGH severityUnverified claimHow we verify

calex##### Listed by clop Ransomware Group: Ransomware Claim — What’s Alleged & What To Do

RBRecent Breaches Breach Intelligence·December 24, 2024
calex##### Listed by clop Ransomware Group

Reported December 24, 2024.

HIGH
Severity
December 24, 2024
Disclosed
ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram

calex##### has been listed by the clop ransomware group, with internal files reported exfiltrated in an attack disclosed on December 24, 2024. Anyone connected to the organisation should check whether their data may have been involved and follow any guidance issued.

Severity & verification
HIGH severityUnverified claim
Contact / identity PII exposed.
Published on a ransomware group’s leak site — an unverified extortion claim until the named organization or credible reporting corroborates it.
Check your exposure
See every leak and listing tied to your email. We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. 15-second check, no card, no account. Details go to your inbox.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Ransomware groups continue to target file-transfer and supply-chain software used by manufacturers and mid-sized firms, turning routine business tools into entry points for data theft and extortion. In late 2024 the Clop ransomware group added another name to its public leak site, listing calex##### as a presumed victim and claiming to hold internal files taken during an attack. The listing, reported on 24 December 2024, sits within a broader campaign in which Clop has asserted it holds data from multiple companies that rely on Cleo software. Exact scale and confirmation remain limited, yet the claim alone raises practical concerns for anyone whose information may have been stored by the organisation.

Public detail is sparse: the number of people affected is unknown, and the precise method of intrusion has not been independently verified. What is known is that Clop presented the organisation as a victim of a ransomware attack involving the exfiltration of internal files. That claim, and the accompanying message that the group’s teams are contacting companies and offering a “special secret chat,” form the core of the incident as it currently stands.

Breaking down the breach

On 24 December 2024 the Clop ransomware group listed calex##### on its leak site. The accompanying announcement identified the presumed victim as Calex Manufacturing and stated that the group possessed data belonging to many companies that use Cleo software. Clop further claimed that its teams were reaching out and calling the company to provide a special secret chat—language typical of the group’s extortion process. The only data type named as exposed is “internal files exfiltrated in a ransomware attack.” No file counts, sample documents, or confirmation of successful encryption or payment demands have been made public. Timing of the actual intrusion, the specific vulnerability exploited, and whether any ransom was paid remain undisclosed. The listing itself is therefore an unverified claim by the threat actor rather than an independently confirmed breach report.

Inside clop

Clop, also styled Cl0p, is a well-documented ransomware operation that has operated for several years under a double-extortion model: data is stolen before systems are encrypted, and the threat of public release is used to pressure victims. The group has repeatedly targeted managed-file-transfer and enterprise software products, most notably through zero-day exploits against MOVEit Transfer in 2023 and, more recently, against Cleo file-transfer applications. In those campaigns Clop has posted long lists of alleged victims on its dark-web leak site, often accompanied by short statements claiming possession of internal data and inviting negotiation. The group typically avoids prolonged technical discussion of its methods in public posts, preferring instead to assert ownership of data and to threaten progressive disclosure. Its earlier activity has affected organisations across manufacturing, logistics, finance and government sectors, establishing a pattern of opportunistic exploitation of widely used business software rather than highly tailored attacks on single targets. Nothing in the public listing for calex##### goes beyond this established pattern; the claim that data from Cleo users has been obtained is presented by Clop itself and has not been independently corroborated for this specific organisation.

Who is calex#####?

calex##### appears in the listing under the presumed name Calex Manufacturing. Public records and industry directories describe Calex Manufacturing as a company that designs and produces power-conversion and electronic components for industrial, medical and commercial customers. Organisations of this type typically maintain engineering drawings, customer order histories, supplier contracts, employee records and quality-control documentation. Because manufacturing firms sit inside larger supply chains, a compromise can affect not only the company itself but also its customers and partners who rely on timely delivery of specialised parts. The consequential nature of a breach here stems from that interconnected position: internal files may contain commercially sensitive designs or personal data of employees and contacts, even if the precise contents of any stolen archive remain unconfirmed.

What data was at risk

The only data type explicitly named in the available facts is “internal files exfiltrated in a ransomware attack.” No further breakdown—such as whether the files included customer lists, financial records, intellectual property or employee information—has been disclosed. Manufacturing organisations commonly hold engineering specifications, purchase orders, shipping records, human-resources files and correspondence with suppliers and clients. Any of those categories could theoretically have been present among the internal files Clop claims to possess, yet the exact contents are unconfirmed. Readers should therefore treat statements about specific data elements as speculative until independent verification or official notification is provided.

Why it matters

For individuals whose personal or professional details may have been stored by calex#####, the primary risks are identity theft, targeted phishing and unsolicited contact that leverages stolen context. Even limited internal files can contain names, email addresses, phone numbers or project references that make subsequent social-engineering attempts more convincing. For the organisation itself, the listing creates reputational pressure, potential contractual notifications to customers and partners, and the operational cost of investigating and containing the incident. Because the number of people affected remains unknown, the practical impact cannot yet be quantified; the absence of confirmed scale does not eliminate the need for caution among those who have done business with or worked for the company. In the wider landscape, each new listing of a Cleo-using firm underscores the continuing attractiveness of file-transfer platforms as high-value targets for ransomware groups.

Were you affected?

If you have been an employee, customer or supplier of calex##### or Calex Manufacturing, treat any unexpected communication that references internal projects or personal details with heightened scrutiny. Change passwords on accounts that may have been linked to the organisation, enable multi-factor authentication where available, and monitor financial and credit statements for unusual activity. Official notifications, if any are issued, will provide the most reliable guidance on next steps. Readers can also run a free exposure scan of their email address to check whether that address has already appeared in known breach data sets; such a scan offers an early indicator but does not replace formal advice from the organisation or relevant authorities.

AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.

Editorial & sourcing policy
Recent Breaches is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data, and we do not hold the data claimed in leak-site listings. Incidents are compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms and are reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — write to support@galaxywarden.com or press@recentbreaches.com.
Check if you’re exposed →

How this breach connects

Company

Attributed to

Method

Companycalex##### security record
87/100
DoxxScan™ · Low doxx risk
B 80Good record

1 reported incident on record.

See calex#####’s full breach history →

More recent breaches

whitm##### Listed by clop Ransomware GroupDecember 24, 2024jomar##### Listed by clop Ransomware GroupDecember 24, 2024cree##### Listed by clop Ransomware GroupDecember 24, 2024polar##### Listed by clop Ransomware GroupDecember 24, 2024

Latest breaches

Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the calex##### Listed by clop Ransomware Group →

Source: threat-actor leak-site listing

Publicly posted by clop — unverified claim, pending independent verification

Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.

Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.

ShareXLinkedInFacebookRedditWhatsAppTelegram