Badoo Data Breach (2013): What Was Exposed & What To Do
SourceBreach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.
The Badoo Data Breach (2013) (reported June 1, 2013) exposed Dates of birth, Email addresses, Genders and Names belonging to roughly 112.0M people. If you have an account with them, your information may now be circulating on the open web and with data brokers. Here’s exactly what happened, how to check if you were affected, and what to do next.
What happened
The records first came to wider attention in June 2016 when they began circulating among individuals who trade in stolen data. The collection is reported to include 112 million unique email addresses along with associated personal details. Available descriptions indicate the material likely originated from an earlier compromise of Badoo systems, yet the company has not issued a public confirmation of the event and the dataset has been classified as unverified.
How a breach like this happens
Incidents involving the exposure of large user databases commonly result from unauthorised access to an organisation’s servers or applications. Attackers may exploit vulnerabilities in web services, obtain credentials through other means, or copy data during a period of undetected presence within a network. Once obtained, such collections are sometimes held for years before appearing on underground markets or being offered for sale.
About Badoo
Badoo operates as an online dating and social networking service that connects users through profile information and messaging features. Services of this type routinely collect and store account details, contact information, and demographic data to facilitate matching and communication between users. A compromise at such a platform can therefore affect a broad population because the service maintains records on millions of individuals across many countries.
The information in question
The dataset is described as containing dates of birth, email addresses, genders, names, passwords stored as MD5 hashes, and usernames. These categories align with the types of information a dating platform would typically retain for user accounts. No additional categories have been confirmed, and the precise contents of every record remain unverified because the data’s authenticity has not been established through official disclosure.
Why it matters
Individuals whose information appears in such collections face the possibility that their email addresses and other details will be used for targeted phishing or account takeover attempts on other services. Passwords hashed with MD5 can, in some cases, be processed further if they are weak or reused, increasing the chance that accounts elsewhere become accessible. For the organisation, the circulation of unverified data still prompts questions about historical security practices and the handling of long-term data retention.
Were you affected?
People who held a Badoo account around 2013 can check whether their email address appears in known breach records by using a free exposure scan service that queries public breach datasets. Changing passwords on Badoo and any other sites where the same credentials may have been used remains a practical first step, along with enabling any available two-factor authentication options.
AICompiled with AI assistance from public sources and published under our editorial standards.
How this breach connects
More recent breaches
Astropid Data Breach (2013)Torrent Invites Data Breach (2013)Pixel Federation Data Breach (2013)Vodafone Data Breach (2013)Latest breaches
Read GalaxyWarden’s full analysis of the Badoo Data Breach (2013) →
Verified breach. Breach data provided in part by Have I Been Pwned, used under CC BY 4.0.
Breach listings — particularly those originating from ransomware or leak sites — are third-party claims that may be unverified, incomplete, or inaccurate. A listing does not by itself confirm that a breach occurred or that any specific data was exposed. Severity is an automated assessment, not a definitive rating. Verification status is shown where available.
Attributions to threat groups and methods reflect public reporting and, in some cases, unverified claims made by the groups themselves; they may be incomplete or later revised. Recent Breaches and GalaxyWarden are independent and are not affiliated with, and do not endorse, any company or group named on this page. This information is aggregated from public sources for awareness only and is not legal, security, or investment advice.